Do You Believe in the Church

Five hundred years ago Martin Luther, Ulrich Zwingli, and John Calvin led Europe in rejecting the Roman Catholic Church and its pope as the mouth of God.

Note that Luther and Calvin did not choose to leave the Catholic Church (although Zwingli, if I remember correctly, did). Luther was horrified at the sale of indulgences, in which the pope’s salesmen threatened dead Catholics with torture from God if they didn’t give money to build St. Peter’s Basilica. All 95 of Luther’s 95 Theses were directed against the sale of indulgences, and the rejection of the doctrine of indulgences was what led to Luther being ejected from the Roman church at the Diet of Worms in 1521.

The problem is, the result has been that Protestants reject any church as being the mouth of God.

The Church and the Promises of God

There are some amazing promises to the church in the Bible.

  • The church is called "the pillar and support of the truth" in 1 Tim. 3:15
  • The church is called "the fullness of him that fills all in all" in Eph. 1:23
  • In 1 Jn. 2:26-27, the church is promised to be protected from deception and led into truth if they will follow the anointing.
  • In Eph. 4:11-16, we are told that the church will be protected from deception and that its members will grow into the fullness of Christ together if they will speak the truth to one another in love.

Don’t those things seem important?

Isn’t "important" an understatement?

Believing

Maybe you could look at those promises again.

Do you believe them? If you do, shouldn’t you do something about them?

Which Church?

I want to suggest that the church that receives and experiences those promises is the only church the Scripture and the apostles know anything about: the local church.

Christians called out of the world and gathered together into a new family in Christ.

Most Christians today don’t want to participate in that church. They just want to attend meetings at their local Christian club.

Jesus promised to be in the midst of any two or three who are gathered in his name. Doesn’t it make sense that those two or three would then have access to all the above promises?

(Keep in mind that Eph. 4:11-16 talks about apostles, shepherds, and other ministers teaching the saints how to take advantage of those promises and build one another up. It can start with 2 or 3, but there is growth needed to walk in the fullness of those promises.)

Practical Application

If you can be attached to believers that are not trapped in tradition, but can be led by the Holy Spirit and by the Scriptures away from deception and into truth, then there’s an important application to consider.

That application is that you would not trust yourself, because you alone are prone to being deceived (Heb. 3:13), and that you would walk together with your brothers and sisters, who are the pillar and support of the truth.

Scary, huh?

But do you believe what the Bible says about the church? Do you believe that it’s Christ’s body? Do you believe that the head can control the body? Or do you believe instead that Jesus is quadriplegic?

Then in the church, you’re going to have to learn to think, "They’re right; I’m wrong."

Posted in Church | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Final Judgments and False Gospels: A Comment

This is an additional thought on that heretical false gospel displayed in the godtube video in my last post.

Note that in the video, the Christian is the worst of all the people there. What will a non-Christian conclude from watching that video? He can conclude only one thing, which is that Jesus has to ignore sin because he doesn’t have the power to deliver us from sin.

We are so careful to avoid a holier-than-thou attitude or saying that we are better than non-Christians.

Did Christ make you better? Did he change your life? Did he make you more righteous in your behavior?

If he didn’t, then you’ve never met him because that’s what he does.

If he did, then Christians are holier than non-Christians, and we are better than non-Christians. They need to know that! We’re not trying to prove we’re wonderful; we’re trying to let non-Christians have some idea that Jesus actually has the power to help them!!!

That godtube video is embarrassing to me and insulting to Jesus.

I wish y’all would go over there and leave them some sensible comments. I’m writing this several days before it goes up on my blog, but as of today I’m unable to leave a comment there. Some technical glitch on my computer or their site.

Posted in Gospel, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Final Judgments and False Gospels

Will the judgment be like many modern Christians describe it?

Or will it be like Jesus describes it?

When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory. Before him, all the nations will be gathered, and he shall separate them from one another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.

Then the King will say to the ones on his right, "Come, you who are blessed by my Father; inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry, and you gave me food; I was thirsty, and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you took me in, naked, and you clothed me. I was sick, and you visited me; I was in prison, and you came to me.

Then the righteous will answer him, saying, "Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you? Or thirsty, and give you something to drink? When did we see you as a stranger and take you in? Or naked and clothe you? Or when did we see you sick or in prison and come to you?

And the King shall answer and and tell them, "Truly I tell you, when you have done it to one of the least of these brothers of mine, you have done it to me."

Then he will tell those at his left, "Depart from me, you cursed ones, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry, and you gave me no food; I was thirsty, and you gave me no drink;
I was a stranger, and you did not take me in; naked, and you did not clothe me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit me.

Then they too will answer him, saying, "Lord, when did we see you hungry, thirsty, a stranger, naked, sick, or in prison, and did not serve you?"

Then he will answer them, saying, "Truly I tell you, when you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me."

And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.

I ask you, could there be a greater difference between the two descriptions?

In one, kindness and compassion don’t matter at all. In the other, they’re the only things that matter.

Heresy?

When we come up a with a doctrine that produces that much difference with Jesus, should we not consider it heresy?

Is it possible that our modern teachings about the atonement and salvation are false gospels? (Actually, it’s not possible; we’ve just seen that it’s certain.)

Or would we rather go on thinking that Jesus didn’t know what he was talking about?

Posted in Gospel, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Power of Zeal for God

My plan for the future is to put up on blog post on Wednesday and one on Saturday. From now on, hopefully it will be at 6 a.m. on each of those days.

I will schedule them to go up consistently, assuming I can follow through on this commitment.

Today, there’s a blog post I can’t beat, and I want to refer you to it.

J. Lee Grady is an editor for Charisma magazine. To be honest, I can’t imagine thinking highly of a mainstream, charismatic magazine. Grady’s articles, however, are consistently excellent. When you get there today, I highly recommend you sign up to get his articles by email. They come out once or twice a week.

His newsletter today is A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Campus Union.

Posted in Holiness, Miscellaneous | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Practical, Visible Christianity

Christians today love to argue doctrines. The problem is, almost all the doctrine we argue is theoretical and cannot be tested. There is nothing practical about our doctrines; there are no ways to see whether they work.

Our forefathers did not see Christianity this way. Theirs was a practical, visible Christianity.

It was a Christianity that is “real world” and that could only be justified if it produced results.

Early Christian Arguments for Christianity

Christianity in its early days was not a major world religion. Paul’s first churches were likely very small, and even by the 2nd century Christians were a small, unpopular, and often persecuted “cult.”

Rumors abounded concerning them. Among the most popular were that they engaged in orgies, tricked new converts into killing babies, then forced them to eat the babies.

Between the rumors and the fact that Christianity was a product of Judaism, but didn’t keep any Jewish rituals (circumcision, animal sacrifices, Sabbath-keeping, and kosher foods), Christians found the need to explain and defend Christianity on a regular basis. Some of those defenses, called “apologies,” are still extant for us to read.

Is there any other matter, my friends, in which we are blamed, than this: that we do not live according to the Law [of Moses], are not circumcised in the flesh as your forefathers were, and do not observe Sabbaths as you do? Are our lives and customs also slandered among you? And I ask this: have you also believed … that we eat men; and that after the feast, having extinguished the lights, we engage in promiscuity? (Justin, Dialogue with Trypho, a Jew 10, c. A.D. 150)

Over and over, the early Christian answer is that their lives are marked by a righteousness that all acknowledge as good and godly.

An excellent example is Trypho’s response to Justin after his statement in the quote above. First, Trypho acknowledges that he doesn’t believe the rumors of cannablism and promiscuity. Then, he expresses surprise that Christians expect a reward from God when they don’t keep his “commandments.”

This is what we are most at a loss about: that you, professing to be pious and supposing yourselves to be better than others, are not separated from them in any particular way. You do not alter your mode of living from that of the nations, in that you observe no festivals or Sabbaths, and you do not have the rite of circumcision. Further, resting your hopes on a crucified man, you still expect to obtain some good thing from God, while you do not obey his commandments! Have you not read that the soul will be cut off from God who is not circumcised on the eighth day? (ibid.)

To Trypho, a Jew, righteousness consisted of rituals like festivals and circumcision that separated the Jews from the cultures around them. As a result, despite knowing of the remarkable lives of Christians, he considered them disobedient to God.

I am aware that your precepts in the so-called Gospel are so wonderful and so great, that I suspect no one can keep them, for I have carefully read them. (ibid.)

The fact is, though, that because of “resting your hopes in a crucified man,” the Christians were keeping them!

And if you wish to compare Christians with yourselves, then even if in some things our discipline is inferior, yet we shall be found much better than you. You forbid, yet commit, adulteries; we are born men only for our own wives. You punish crimes when committed; with us, even to think of crimes is to sin. You are afraid of those who are aware of what you do; we are afraid even of our own consciences, without which we cannot exist. Finally, from your numbers the prisons boil over, but there is no Christian there unless he is accused on account of his religion or has deserted it. (Minucius Felix, The Octavius, c. 150 – 230)

Justin explains to Trypho what really matters to God:

If, therefore, God proclaimed a new covenant … and this for a light of the nations [which Justin had just quoted Hebrew Scripture to prove], we see and are persuaded that men approach God, leaving their idols and other unrighteousness, through the name of him who was crucified, Jesus Christ, and abide by their confession even unto death, and maintain piety. (Justin, ibid. 11)

What piety was Justin talking about?

We have seen already that Minucius Felix chose avoiding adultery, guarding our thoughts, living by our consciences, and avoiding crimes to illustrate righteousness. We have also seen that Trypho knew about “precepts in the so-called Gospel … so wonderful and so great.”

Surely Trypho is referring to things such as those we read in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7). Jesus said the humble, the poor in spirit, the merciful, and those who endure persecution are those who are blessed (Matt. 5:3-12). He adds that we will be judged on the last day for our care for those in need that we have met (Matt. 25:31-46).

The early Christians agree that these are the things that matter:

Among us you will find uneducated persons, craftsmen, and old women, who, if they are unable in words to prove the benefit of our doctrine, yet by their deeds exhibit the benefit arising from their persuasion of its truth. They do not rehearse speeches, but exhibit good works; when struck, they do not strike again; when robbed, they do not go to law; they give to those that ask of them, and love their neighbors as themselves. (Athenagoras, A Plea for the Christians 11, A.D. 177)

He has exhorted us to lead all men, by patience and gentleness, from shame and the love of evil. And this indeed is proved in the case of many who once were of your way of thinking, but have changed their violent and tyrannical disposition, being overcome either by the constancy which they have witnessed in their neighbors’ lives, or by the extraordinary forbearance they have observed in their fellow travelers when defrauded, or by the honesty of those with whom they have transacted business. (Justin, First Apology 16, c. A.D. 150)

It is mainly the deeds of a love so noble that lead many to label us. “See,” they say, “How they love one another!” For they themselves are animated by mutual hatred. “How they are ready even to die for one another!” For they themselves will sooner put to death. They are angry with us, too, because we call each other brothers and sisters. … But perhaps the very reason we are regarded as having less right to be considered true brothers is that no tragedy causes dissension in our brotherhood. Or maybe it is that the family possessions, which generally destroy brotherhood among you, create fraternal bonds among us. One in mind and soul, we do not hesitate to share our earthly goods with one another. (Tertullian, Apology 39, c. A.D. 210)

God’s Foundation

Paul once said that the sure, firm foundation of God has an inscription on it (2 Tim. 2:19). According to the apostle, it says two things:

  • The Lord knows those who are his.
  • Let those who name the name of Christ depart from iniquity.

Over the last 2,000 years, have we found new foundations to lay? Or perhaps new and additional inscriptions to write on God’s foundation?

Conclusion

That last sentence would have made a good ending, but I have to pass on one more thought.

On the last day, which Jesus described in Matthew 25:31-46, is the great Judge of all going to add the doctrines that matter to modern Christians in his judgment of the sheep and the goats? While we’ve been learning new ways to judge who is a sheep and who isn’t, has Jesus been learning, too? Is he changing his plans for the final judgment?

I suspect that his plans for the judgment have not changed at all. I suspect that he is still the great Shepherd of the sheep, that he still knows those who are his, and that the standards that will be used at that final judgment are still being used today … at least by Jesus, who Paul says “knows those who are his.”

Perhaps it would behoove us to conform our judgment to his.

Posted in History, Holiness, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Really Important Things a Christian Should Know

I’ve been promising myself and friends I would upload this list for a few weeks. These are just a random assortment of issues. I’m sure there’s some important ones I’m missing. Feel free to add those in the comments.

In fact, more permanently, I’d love you to add them at Christian History for Everyman, where I’ve uploaded a longer version of this page.

You can do anything.

Following Christ is all about faith. There is a zeal that is the product of really believing that “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me” (Php. 4:13)

Your zeal to follow Jesus will make up for almost any mistakes in what follows

Tremendous faith in and love for Jesus will resolve almost any lack of knowledge or misunderstandings you have about the Christian faith. Love him, love his commands, and spend much time in fellowship with him. That is more important than anything else, and it will make up for mistakes in every other area.

Christianity is a spiritual religion.

It is those who walk by the Spirit who are the sons of God (Rom. 8:14). Like it or not, Christianity is a highly subjective religion, and we are going to have to give room to one another to be moved by the Spirit of God.
Christianity is a CORPORATE, spiritual religion
God does promise to lead us into all things by the Spirit, but 1 Jn. 2:27 has all plural yous, no singular ones. It is together that we are led into truth, and while we have to give each other freedom to follow God’s Spirit, we must all be aware that we are easily deceived and need our brother’s exhortations (Heb. 3:13). Eph. 4:11-16 is another great passage, and 1 Jn. 2:27 and Eph. 4:11-16 explain why the church is called the pillar and support of the truth by Paul in 1 Tim. 3:15.

The modern churches often worship the Bible, and we must not follow them in that.

Modern American Christians almost universally trust their intellect over the leading of the Spirit. They claim to be following the Bible, but they’re not. They’re following tradition and their interpretations of the Bible, which are almost never based on any real, honest, skilled analysis of what the Bible teaches. Thus, American churches are almost universally powerless and embarrassing (even if some individual Christians are not) because they refuse to be taught by God to deliver them from their chains of tradition and complacency.

Christians can’t be afraid of the truth

It’s not very nice to say that American churches are almost universally powerless and embarrassing, but it’s the truth. If we want to see Jesus glorified, then it’s more important to do his will and concern ourselves with his feelings than to worry about hurting each other’s feelings.

The local church is incredibly important. If we don’t know that, the devil certainly does.

For most Americans the local church is only important insofar as it helps us be better Christians. Nonsense. You are not Jesus’ bride or body; the church is. Thus, what benefits the church is far, far more important than what might benefit you. The light that Jesus wants to shine to the world is not “this little light of mine,” but the great light of the church (Matt. 5:13-16, where all the yous are plural; cf. also Isaiah 60:1ff). Even in America, if Christians come together in wholehearted submission to Christ, agreeing that they need one another (1 Cor. 12), and giving themselves to each other for life as the family of God, they will experience a miraculous level of persecution, and they will understand why Paul says that all who desire to live godly in Christ suffer persecution (2 Tim. 3:12). The key is “in Christ,” which is in his church, which is his body.

Our unity is based on obedience, not theological arguments.

2 Tim. 2:19 is a terribly important verse in our day. The foundation of God is that he himself knows who belongs to him. We don’t need to concern ourselves with that. But Paul adds that the other part of the foundation is that those who name the name of Christ must depart from iniquity. Those who say we need not depart from iniquity to be in fellowship with Christ are false preachers of the Gospel who must be anathematized. But also, those who divide over tongues, eternal security (as long as everyone acknowledges that those who go to heaven are those obedient to Christ by his Spirit), the baptism of the Holy Spirit, the role of water baptism, etc. are sinning. The church needs to be reunited, and the church consists of all those who name the name of Christ and depart from iniquity.

You’ll know this is true because it’s possible to have the witness of the Spirit between those who depart from iniquity. Don’t let stupid modern doctrines that we fool ourselves into thinking we understand prevent that marvelous unity that is created only by the Spirit of God.

Real Christianity is not theoretical; it’s eminently practical

Faith vs. works is a worthless discussion. Jesus wants us to do works by faith, and we’re only distracted by the arguments. Paul discussed faith to get people away from depending on the Law. James slammed faith only (Jam. 2:14-26) to stop people from trusting in faith apart from works. Jesus just wants you to keep his commands (Jn. 15:10). Yes, you can only do that by abiding in him (Jn. 15:5), but don’t worry, if you try to obey him without his power, you’ll figure out you need him on your own. Talking about faith and works is conterproductive. You must do works to go to heaven (Matt. 7:21-23; 25:31-46; Paul agrees throughout his writings, but you shouldn’t need anyone else’s word but Jesus’), and you have to come to Jesus for the power to do those works. Talking about it is a waste of time. Just get busy obeying him because you’re not going to heaven if you don’t (Matt. 7:21-23; Eph. 5:3-8; 1 Jn. 2:3-4).

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

A Little Politics: Sarah Palin, Targets, and Assassinations

Yesterday, I was in the remarkably unusual position of having to agree with … Sean Hannity.

I can’t remember when the last time I agreed with Sean Hannity was, and I certainly could never have imagined being proud of agreeing with him. I don’t even listen to him very much, perhaps 2 hours a year.

Yesterday, though, I was driving, and I couldn’t find any other news to listen to.

What he said was that the (stupid, rude, embarrassing, unthinking, shameful, politically-motivated) accusation that Sarah Palin helped encourage the shooting of congresswoman Gabby Giffords would backfire on them.

Yep.

I gave up agreeing with right-wing political talk show hosts like Hannity and Limbaugh over a decade ago. I roll my eyes when I hear their conspiracy theories being brought up.

Yesterday, though, Hannity was like a sage, calmly and clearly refuting the sick, politically-motivated accusation that Sarah Palin helped fuel Jared Loughner’s shooting spree in Tucson on January 8. Of course, it was easy for Hannity to be calm and clear because the accusation is ludicrous, and anyone making that accusation ought to be embarrassed. Only the most unthinking extreme of the left will pay attention to it.

In this case, though, I really just want to talk about that one statement. This accusation is going to backfire. That’s the statement I agree with.

I’m living proof of it.

I’ve done everything I could to drive the idea out of my mind that the mainstream media leans far to the left. In some cases, that’s not too hard. Some mainstream anchors are clearly doing their best to simply report the news in an open-minded way.

Talk radio, however, accuses especially the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times as being the worst culprits.

Sure enough, every article I’ve seen listed in my Google news update that has been marketing the accusation against Palin—and slandering her without quotes when she responded—has come from those three newspapers.

In fact, you should see this hymn of praise to Obama by the Washington Post. It’s followed by a brief attack on Palin for using the words "blood libel" in her response to morons blaming her for someone’s death because she used crosshairs in an ad; crosshairs pointed not at a person but at a map.

Good grief.

I think that I no longer qualify as a supporter of the right, and I certainly don’t qualify as a supporter of Republicans (I voted for Obama), but the behavior of the Washington Post, the LA Times, and the NY Times makes me want to go back to supporting them. They may have some awful ideas, be arrogant, and be mostly white, but at least they’re living in the real world, where you can talk about and try to change those problems.

Liberals tend to live in an imaginary world where homeless people are mostly responsible dads out of work; and where the best way we can repay blacks and Indians for the awful things our ancestors did to them is by referring to them with more acceptable names like African Americans and Native Americans. In the meanwhile we keep them on welfare, leave them feeling awful about themselves, and refuse to address their their alcohol, drug, and illegitimacy problems because we’re not allowed to admit they have them!

I’m sure everything I just said is politically incorrect, but I’m also sure that the people who disagree with me have not spent large portions of time actually hanging out with those homeless people, many of whom would never want back into our lonely, locked-up-in-the-house society. They’re happy to to exchange our air conditioners and comfortable beds for friends and freedom. Others, however, are hopelessly addicted to drugs and alcohol, and giving them checks every week is no help to them.

Actually, I want to repent for using "politics" in the title of this post. This post is not about politics; it’s about common sense and not pretending like things are the way they are. We can work on problems, but not if we pretend they’re not there and mandate certain ways of speaking in order to maintain our illusions.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Why I’m Not Catholic: Gandhi and the Truth

I got another email today (or maybe yesterday) from someone that wants me to be Catholic. In this case, he wanted to defend the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation by explaining what they "really" think about it.

It’s no wonder that Protestants are so oriented towards beliefs and theology rather than obedience and practical spirituality. We inherited our attitudes from our Roman ancestry!

For me, not being a Catholic is not about anything that can be written in a book.

It’s about experience.

I’ve tried Catholicism. It doesn’t work.

Let me add that I’m really not interested in hearing about a doctrine from a church that killed people who wouldn’t accept that doctrine. That, in and of itself, makes their doctrine and the church demonic. Nothing further to talk about.)

The "Fruit" of Experience

Roman Catholicism doesn’t look anything like early Christianity.

Does it have some of the same doctrines? Sure. Does it have beliefs that are more similar to apostolic Christianity than Protestantism? That depends on the importance you assign to individual doctrines.

Does Roman Catholicism have some of the same behavior as early Christianity.

No. Not in the least. There’s not even a resemblance.

I’ve read all the writings of the 2nd century church. I’ve ready them all twice, in fact. Most of them I’ve read more than that, and I’ve been researching in them for a couple decades.

Other people have done that and joined the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.

Apparently they were looking for something different than I was.

Long ago, I was captivated by Acts 2:42-47. I read Gene Edwards description of early church life in his book Revolution: The Story of the Early Church.

Excited Christians … Together … Brave … Bold …

Not too concerned about anything but knowing Jesus.

That’s what I saw in the early church fathers.

What did they believe about the Eucharist? I noticed that in passing, and I made up my mind long ago to agree with them on all such subjects.

But that’s an extremely minor part of the whole picture.

I have to fight the desire to load you down with examples, then shoot down the arguments I know would be coming from those who don’t care what’s true, so they "quote mine" out of context to defend their particular doctrines.

I’ll resist. Instead, I’ll direct you to the first few chapters of Justin’s Apology and to the very early Letter to Diognetus. Look at what they consider important in describing 2nd century Christianity.

I don’t have to say anything about Acts. Where are the references to rituals, priests, and unimportant doctrines in that history?

Back to the point of this section now that I’ve spent too much time defending my point … but at least it’s less than what I usually do.

Jesus said that you should always make fruit and tree match. Good fruit comes from good trees. Bad fruit comes from bad trees. Don’t excuse trees that give bad fruit, and don’t condemn trees producing good fruit.

Roman Catholicism produces fruit. Early Christianity produces fruit.

The fruit’s not similar.

It’s like comparing apples and oranges … literally.

You’ll have to excuse me, but I’m busy finding apostolic Christianity. I want its fruit. I want Acts 2:42-47.

Oh, that’s right. I have it.

So, I think I’ll pass on reading books about trees that produce some other fruit. Excuse them all you want. Point out the wonderful texture of their bark, and deceitfully depict the history of those trees.

Just don’t do it on my time.

Comparing Apples to Apples

Ok, let’s pick on the Protestants, too. Let’s throw something in for shock value.

Well, no. Let’s throw it in for truth value, and we’ll just enjoy the shock as a side benefit.

We’ve talked about admitting that two trees with different fruit are different trees. Let’s look at admitting that two trees with the same fruit are the same trees.

Mohandes Gandhi and apostolic Christianity.

You want to find the same fruit as early Christianity? Try Gandhi.

Gandhi believed in Christ. He just called him Truth rather than Jesus.

I’m not passing on something I heard secondhand. I read some of what Gandhi wrote. He called Truth a being, and he said that if you follow Truth, you won’t need to defend yourself. Truth would defend you.

Jesus is the Truth.

No, that’s not really correct. The Truth is Jesus. He was the Truth first; Jesus later.

Gandhi knew the Truth.

No, no, no. I don’t mean he knew everything that was true. I mean he knew this Being called Truth. He acted in submission to what that Being believed. He adjusted his behavior so that he would have this Being’s support in what he did.

And he drove mighty England out of India without firing a shot.

Gandhi has influenced more people to follow Christ than you or I have even even dreamed of influencing. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Leo Tolstoy, Martin Luther King … all of them were influenced to follow Jesus wholeheartedly because of Gandhi.

There’s no telling how many others.

Who knows? Maybe Jesus liked having his name changed to Truth. That way he might not have to be associated with Christianity, which in general looks nothing like what Christ did, and so is nothing like what Christ taught. Christianity, in general, can be safely ignored.

Unless any branch of it gets political power, that is. In that case, you’ll need the Truth, like Gandhi and the early church did, to drive that tyrannical evil from its throne of power.

Of course, you’ll have to triumph by dying.

That’s how Christians do it, you know.

Am I Condemning Everyone?

Well, I hope I’m not condemning anyone, but maybe I’m coming across real harsh.

I don’t know, but we might as well look at what’s true. We like to argue about trees. Jesus commands us to look at fruit.

Gandhi did what Jesus did. Most of our churches don’t.

Not everyone, though. Friends have visited David Platt’s church in Birmingham. What they’re doing seem rather Jesus-like. I’ve seen videos of Francis Chan’s former church in southern California. What he teaches seems very Jesus’ like.

I say that about Francis Chan because he’s asking people to do very Jesus-like things, not because I know anything about whether his theology is Jesus-like. Jesus said to judge the theology by the behavior it produces, not vice versa. It’s high time we paid attention to him.

Look sometime at the context of the word "doctrine" in the incorrectly-named pastoral epistles. It’s there 16 times. That little study can be life-changing for an American Christian. Sure was for me.

I’m sure there’s many more who are really doing what they’re doing, but they’re really hard to find. And I’ve met dozens of people who love Acts 2:42-47 like I do, but who can’t find it. And all of them tell me they know dozens of people the same way.

Hopefully, God’s moving. The "Organic Church" movement was started, I think, by Neil Cole, author of a book by the same name, and I really hope they’re living out a real Christianity. I met some people from that movement in Roseville, CA, and I have a lot of hope in that.

There’s some folks in Memphis doing it really well, too. It’s very unfortunate that they won’t really have contact with us because they don’t like something I said about works—with the church’s approval—on the Rose Creek Village web site. Nonetheless, they’re doing a really excellent job of living out a Christianity that’s noticeably similar to Jesus, the apostles, and the churches the apostles started.

May we never be satisfied with less.

Posted in Church, Gospel, Modern Doctrines, Roman Catholic & Orthodox, Unity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Real Spiritual Battles

I’m not going to get up a post every day in 2011, nor even one each day in January. It was fun pulling that off in December, but sometimes these posts take me a couple hours!

Anyway, there was more I wanted to say from yesterday’s post, but I really didn’t know how to organize it. I still don’t, but here’s some important thoughts.

I was in the Charismatic movement for several years as a young Christian. A lot of this post is addressed to Charismatics, and it especially applies to the Word-Faith movement, many of whom are perfect Laodiceans: impoverished, starving, and blind without knowing it.

Spiritual Armor

There are two things we need for spiritual battle. We need to know God, and we need to know one another.

Successful spiritual battle is founded in the unity of the church.

No, Paul didn’t list unity as one of the items needed in Ephesians 6 for standing against the devil, but he does reference it—repeatedly.

We just don’t recognize it because the devil has successfully defeated so many of us already.

Paul tells us in 1 Cor. 12 that we desperately need one another. We can’t function without one another any more than a finger can function without a hand.

So, let me ask you a question. What percentage of people with a deliverance ministry are completely confident that they only need Jesus and themselves?

Yeah, most of them.

They’ve been defeated already. They think the danger is addiction, dark rings around the eyes, and epileptic seizures.

Instead, the danger is separation, self-confidence, selfish ambition, pride.

They roll in, and they don’t get cast out.

Addictions are bad. Addicted people, though, at least know they need help!

Don’t believe me?

Let’s look again at Ephesians 6.

Ephesians 6 and the Spiritual Armor of Unity

1 Cor. 12 says it’s impossible for us to battle the devil without one another.

Actually, 1 Cor. 12 says it’s impossible for us to do anything without one another. I just got more specific.

There’s huge dangers from not being accountable, loved, and part of a family. The biggest danger is deception (Eph. 4:11-16; Heb. 3:13; 1 Jn. 2:19-27).

But we’ve ignored that because we’re good rugged American individualists. We just need Jesus and our Bible.

We know that the spiritual armor in Ephesians 6 doesn’t include unity, and it doesn’t require anyone else.

Yeah, right. We’re deceived.

EPHESIANS 6:11-19:
Finally, brothers, be strong in the Lord and in the power of his might.
Put on, the whole armor of God that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, and against spiritual wickedness in the heavenlies.
Therefore take up the whole armor of God so that you may be able to stand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
Stand therefore, having your loins girt with truth,
Having the breastplate of righteousness,
And your feet shod with the preparation of the Gospel of Peace.
Above all, take the shield of faith, with which you may be able to quench all the fiery arrows of the wicked one.
And take the helmet of salvation
And the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God
Praying always with all supplication in the Spirit
And staying up to watch with all perseverance and pleading for all saints
And for me, that utterance may be given to me to allow me to open my mouth boldly to make known the mystery of the Gospel.

I bolded the parts that reference the unity of the saints.

I know, I know. It’s not that much <sarcasm>.

The parts bolded at the beginning are the plural parts. Those aren’t individual commands. Those are commands to "y’all."

Then there’s the word righteousness, which Paul—a good covenant Jew who believed that Jesus fulfilled the covenant and brought Gentiles into the covenant and people of God—understood to refer to those who are walking as part of the covenant people of God.

Then there’s the Gospel of Peace. You may have read about that earlier in the letter to the Ephesians, where Jesus, who is our peace, preached peace to those who were far off and those who were near so that through him we might both—Jew and Gentile—have access to the Father by the one Spirit (2:14-22; you may want to read that).

And then there’s the helmet of salvation. What is our salvation except that we have been brought into the people of God? If we do not speak to one another daily, then we are in danger of not being saved, as sin will harden our hearts (Heb. 3:13). We are joined to one another, so that none of us can say we don’t need the other (1 Cor. 12). We grow "together" into a holy habitation in the Spirit for the Lord (Eph. 2:22).

And finally, part of our spiritual battle is praying for all saints.

Wait, that’s not the last part. Then Paul adds that he needs prayer in order to preach the Gospel himself, and to tell others that they can come into the great unity and power of the people of God.

Even the great apostle Paul, whose name was known even to the demons (Acts 19:15), didn’t think he could do it on his own!

I’m sure there’s more I’m missing because I, too, was raised as a Christian in the great deception of American Christianity, that thinks there’s such a thing as "just Jesus and me" and so often brings people into one-limbed bodies. (The word "member" in 1 Cor. 12 is literally "limb" it’s not member like a club.)

I was raised in Christianity that can call a building a church or think that attending meetings could constitute being part of the church: the covenant people of God.

Back to the Point

What I described above is the reality of Ephesians 6.

It is not the reality of most deliverance ministries. They live in a completely different reality. They think Christianity is an individual religion. (I’ll give you an important point about that in a moment.)

Ephesians 6 is written so that we may stand against the wiles of the devil.

In other words, he’s tricky (as are his ministers: Eph. 4:14).

The deliverance ministries are needing deliverance! They’ve been tricked, and they don’t know it!

I met a lady who had been treated (that’s the right word) by a particularly good deliverance ministry in Georgia. I mean that sincerely. They did some good things, and they had good advice for people.

The lady had been in really bad condition, and they helped her.

But she was coming to us because she was lonely and needed to be a part of something. She was on a fast track downward.

I asked the lady what happened after this deliverance ministry had "treated" her for a month or so. She was surprised I asked. She barely understood the question.

"They sent me home," she said.

"To whom?" I asked.

"Huh?" she replied.

She didn’t get it. They sent her home to nothing. Nothing was what led to her problems. They had delivered her, and the house was swept, but it was also empty! This is a bad thing! (Matt. 12:43-45).

Once I explained it to her, she said, "They did give me literature."

Nice.

Knowing the right things won’t do the job. We need people, or we will be deceived.

Addendum: Practical Advice

What people am I talking about? I’m talking about people who will join you in following Christ, whether that is one, two, or two hundred people. Love one another, be with one another, visit each other, confess your faults to one another, and act like you’re family! If you believe the Gospel, you are family!

And once again, if you don’t know what to do together, make use of this advice when you get together.

But get together. Pay the price to make it happen.

Posted in Church, Holiness, Unity | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Talkin’ to the Devil

I really wanted to try to get a post up every day in December. Looks like I made it, assuming I actually finish this post. I need to take a break and drive the rest of the way home from California. I’m in Fort Smith, Arkansas as I start this. With the RV, it will take about 8 hours to get back to Selmer.

I was singing a song as I drove yesterday, and I really like it. The chorus is worth recounting to you:

We’re the people of God
Called by his name
Called from the dark
And delivered from shame
One holy race
Saints every one
It’s because of the blood of Christ
Jesus the Son

The second verse, though, begins with, “Hear us, O spirits of darkness … ”

Some Christians like to talk to spirits of darkness. They like to rebuke the devil, and they like to do it as sharply as they please. We don’t think much about statements like Jude 9:

Michael the archangel, when he was disputing with the devil in contention over the body of Moses, did not dare to bring a railing accusation, but said, "The Lord rebuke you."

There’s something about respect, even when it’s given to a terrible and evil opponent like the devil.

Notice that it specifies what sort of accusation Michael was unwilling to bring. He wasn’t willing to descend into "railing." The picture I get is uncontrolled temper or insult.

Christians who get carried away with rebuking the devil often say whatever they want with no restraint.

I don’t believe they know what they’re getting into.

Spiritual Warfare

We love to do spiritual warfare. We love to rebuke the devil, and some of us are just looking for the opportunity to cast out a demon. We bind things, loose things, and claim the spiritual armor of protection. We plead the blood over ourselves …

And we miss the spiritual battles going on all around us.

We miss the little temptations. We miss the times when we’re blinded to the need around us. We miss the voice of the Lord trying to get us to go some other direction than our own.

We think we’re doing spiritual battle while we loudly insult the devil, but in the meantime his evil demons are leading us astray minute by minute.

The Devil’s Not Toothless

(Finishing this back home)

I’ve heard this ridiculous theory that the devil, who, according to 1 Pet. 5:8, walks around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour, is toothless.

What?

The devil devours Christians all the time. More than ever. Yes, even in the Charismatic churches, where they’re pronouncing that he doesn’t devour anyone.

Look around!

The reason Christians can be foolish enough to think he’s toothless is that we’re so used to being scattered across the hillsides that it doesn’t bother us when members of the "flock"—or perhaps better said, the non-flock—go missing.

No one notices when Christians disappear. The good shepherd knows the name and condition of every one of his sheep. If one goes missing, then he leaves the 99 and goes to find that one.

Today, if one goes missing, no one notices.

I didn’t capitalize "good shepherd" a moment ago because when Jesus talks about his being the Good Shepherd, he contrasts it with hirelings who don’t care about the sheep. One of the main ways the Good and Great Shepherd shepherds the flock is through good shepherds who are not hirelings; who care about the flock.

Elders are told to shepherd the flock repeatedly (Acts 20:28; 1 Pet. 5:2). We need not only the Good Shepherd in heaven, but the Good Shepherd using his body on earth. (Heads, you may realize, don’t shepherd very well without a body.)

Resist Him Steadfast in the Faith

We’re in a battle with a real enemy who not only fires arrows, but fires flaming arrows. He not only has teeth, but he has actually dragged off Christians and killed them (spiritually).

You can debate the theology of that all you want. My answer is, look around. I don’t care whether you think they lost their salvation when they were dragged off and left crippled in the world, I just care that we stop that from happening!

The devil is walking around looking for people to devour, and he is devouring them!

He’s devouring a lot of people who insult him and call him toothless.

Real warriors don’t spend their time insulting their opponents. They fight him.

We are called to resist the devil, standing strong in the faith. We are called to follow Michael’s example and avoid railing accusation. The weapons listed in Ephesians 6 do not include insult, boasting, or denouncing.

Rallying to the Battle

Sheep do better together with a shepherd watching over them. When they’re scattered on the hillside, God gets really mad (see Jer. 23).

In 2010, I got to hear about people–people in high places!–who were saying that and making it happen. They were actually preaching that Christians ought to obey Christ, not just get a free ticket to heaven, and they were calling them to do it together. How exciting!

In 2011, let’s jump on the bandwagon.

Now I’m actually going to say something really practical. If you don’t know how to do that, do this:

Go to this page, grab the super simple info on "Life Transformation Groups," grab a brother if you’re a brother and a sister if you’re a sister, and start getting together once per week.

If you’re already part of a flock, you can use that resource for ideas for keeping tabs on one another. We all need it.

Oh, Yeah, About That Battle

Oh, and make sure you actually work on possessing those weapons listed in Ephesians 6—Faith, the Word of God, a Love for Truth, Salvation—because the devil, who’s not toothless, really doesn’t like Christians developing spiritual family relationships. It leads to real shepherds (rather than mere club presidents giving speeches every week) watching over a real flock.

And a real flock is a real force.

Posted in Leadership, Miscellaneous | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments