“Global” Passages of Scripture

Posted on 03/23/2019 by

My wife reminded me about passages I call “global passages.” They cover the entire Christian life from conversion to the final judgment in just a few verses.

I only have two right now.

Romans 7:24 to 8:13

This passage is a little more global than the next one because it covers our sad state of bondage prior to the great and free salvation of Jesus Christ. It begins in Romans 7:24 with the agonizing cry of “Oh, wretched man that I am.” The wonderful announcement of the “Law of the Spirit of Life” that delivers us from this wretched state follows in Romans 8:2.

The Apostle Paul then explains the process. What the Law of Moses could not do because it had nothing to resolve sin in the flesh, God did. He sent his Son, clothed in our sinful flesh as a sin offering, and sin in the flesh was condemned with him (Romans 8:3). He then rose mightily from the grave, setting us free from bondage. This is assumed, though not mentioned, in the passage. When we believe in him and are baptized, we receive the Holy Spirit, and if we walk in the Spirit, we fulfill the righteousness of the Law (though not the literal Law of Moses itself; rather, its fullness, Matt. 5:17-48). As long as we do this, we have life and peace, and will live. If we do not, we have death and will die (Rom. 8:5-13).

2 Peter 1:3-11

This passage begins in 2 Peter 1:3-4 with a majestic description of the gifts we have when we receive the Spirit of God and come under the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus mention in Romans 8:2 and described in Romans 8:3-4. You have to read those two verses to appreciate just who the death and resurrection of Christ and the receiving of the Holy Spirit has made you to be!

His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire. (ESV)

Now that is worth jumping up and shouting over. In our lost state, when we decide to pursue righteousness, we want to cry out, “Who will deliver me from this body of death?” Jesus does not just deliver us from this body of death, but he transforms us into a new creature (2 Cor. 5:17) that fits the description in 2 Peter 1:3-4.

One of our greatest problems as Christians is that we do not believe what the Scriptures say of us, either because we have not been told or because we are used to counting ourselves poor sinners. We WERE poor sinners, but now we are SAVED. We are created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God has prepared in advance for us to do (Eph. 2:10) “SAVED” is a big word. (We are commanded to think of ourselves properly in Romans 6:11.)

This hymn gives our proper response to being saved:

Redeemed; How I Love to Proclaim It

Redeemed—how I love to proclaim it!
Redeemed by the blood of the Lamb;
Redeemed through His infinite mercy,
His child, and forever, I am.

Redeemed and so happy in Jesus,
No language my rapture can tell;
I know that the light of His presence
With me doth continually dwell.

I think of my blessed Redeemer,
I think of Him all the day long;
I sing, for I cannot be silent;
His love is the theme of my song.

I know I shall see in His beauty
The King in whose way I delight;
Who lovingly guardeth my footsteps,
And giveth me songs in the night.

There can be no lesser reaction to 2 Peter 1:3-4 than described in that hymn.

In 2 Peter 1:5-8, Peter describes how to turn that “great salvation” (Heb. 2:3) into a life of abundant fruitfulness and knowledge of our Lord Jesus. Finally, though, we must remember that Hebrews 2:3 is a warning not to neglect our “great salvation.” We must work out our own salvation (Php. 2:12), not by our own power (Jn. 15:5) but by our own volition. If we want that rich and abundant promised entrance into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Savior, King Jesus, we must be diligent to follow the path Peter describes in 2 Peter 1:5-8 (2 Peter 1:9-11).

Posted in Bible, Modern Doctrines, Rebuilding the Foundations, Through the Bible | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Favorite Early Christian Passage: Commandment 12 of the Shepherd of Hermas

Posted on 03/21/2019 by

The Ante-Nicene Fathers Series refers to this section of The Shepherd of Hermas as “Commandment XII.” The Lightfoot translation that I am quoting from and linking to calls it Mandate 12. Search “Mandate 12” (or phrases in the quote) at the link to find the passage. It speaks for itself without my commentary.

3[46]:1 “I would fain know, Sir,” say I, “in what ways I ought to serve the good desire.” “Listen,” saith he; “practice righteousness and virtue, truth and the fear of the Lord, faith and gentleness, and as many good deeds as are like these. Practicing these thou shalt be well-pleasing as a servant of God, and shalt live unto Him; yea, and every one who shall serve the good desire shall live unto God.”

3[46]:2 So he completed the twelve commandments, and he saith to me; Thou hast these commandments; walk in them, and exhort thy hearers that their repentance may become pure for the rest of the days of their life.

3[46]:3 This ministration, which I give thee, fulfill thou with all diligence to the end, and thou shalt effect much. For thou shalt find favor among those who are about to repent, and they shall obey thy words. For I will be with thee, and will compel them to obey thee.”

3[46]:4 I say to him; “Sir, these commandments are great and beautiful and glorious, and are able to gladden the heart of the man who is able to observe them. But I know not whether these commandments can be kept by a man, for they are very hard.”

3[46]:5 He answered and said unto me; “If thou set it before thyself that they can be kept, thou wilt easily keep them, and they will not be hard; but if it once enter into thy heart that they cannot be kept by a man, thou wilt not keep them.

3[46]:6 But now I say unto thee; if thou keep them not. but neglect them thou shalt not have salvation, neither thy children nor thy household, since thou hast already pronounced judgment against thyself that these commandments cannot be kept by a man.”

4[47]:1 And these things he said to me very angrily, so that I was confounded, and feared him exceedingly; for his form was changed, so that a man could not endure his anger.

4[47]:2 And when he saw that I was altogether disturbed and confounded, he began to speak more kindly [and cheerfully] to me, and he saith; “Foolish fellow, void of understanding and of doubtful mind, perceivest thou not the glory of God, how great and mighty and marvelous it is, how that He created the world for man’s sake, and subjected all His creation to man, and gave all authority to him, that he should be master over all things under the heaven?

4[47]:3 If then,” [he saith,] “man is lord of all the creatures of God and mastereth all things, cannot he also master these commandments Aye,” saith he, “the man that hath the Lord in his heart can master [all things and] all these commandments.

4[47]:4 But they that have the Lord on their lips, while their heart is hardened, and are far from the Lord, to them these commandments are hard and inaccessible.

4[47]:5 Therefore do ye, who are empty and fickle in the faith, set your Lord in your heart, and ye shall perceive that nothing is easier than these commandments, nor sweeter, nor more gentle.

Posted in Early Christianity, Holiness | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Catching Up: Exciting Things

Posted on 03/19/2019 by

I haven’t written here in four months, but I have not been inactive.

I have completed the rough draft of “Taking Aim at Rome’s Audacious Claim.” The rough draft is 256 pages. I suspect I will lose at least 20 pages in editing. I do need to add an appendix or three. The book is a historical look at how the Roman Catholic papacy developed.

I want to give praise for the spiritual growth I have seen in our community, Rose Creek Village. A lot of that has been the direct result of prayer. Pray, see quick answers; point out problems to God, see quick answers. That part is delightful. Working out issues when your church is very close and interacts with each other often can be painful because God requires us to be honest with one another. This can be done safely where brothers and sisters feel safe with one another. Maintaining that safeness with one another spiritually, that is the work.

I am part of an accountability group of six brothers. We have explored different ways of making our time as worthwhile as possible. We are about to begin a discipleship program from zumeproject.com. We already know something about provoking one another to love and good works (Heb. 10:24) and holding each other accountable, but we want to be trained to be influencers who touch the lives of those around us. Hopefully, we already do this, but we want it to be purposeful and to reach outside our church community into Selmer.

To begin that process, we have started a Bible study in town with a couple sisters we know. I’d love to have brothers there, too, but that’s not what we have right now. Our goal is to reach that neighborhood with the Gospel in a purposeful manner. We are not starting a church. We are teaching these ladies how to behave like the members of the one church in Selmer that they are.

A young brother managed to hear about and bring me to the ministerial association in our county. I was more than thrilled the month one of the local pastors (or “of First Christian Church”) talked about the difference between just working together and displaying the unity that Jesus prayed for in John 17:20. There was a lot of resistance from the seven or eight other pastors there, which discouraged the First Christian pastor a bit. He told me so at a lunch later. He asked me if I was surprised at the resistance. I told him I had been pushing this message for over 30 years, and I was surprised at the acceptance. At least two of the other pastors were very open to talking about real unity versus just working together. To me a 70-80% rejection rate is infinitely better than a 100% rejection rate (both practically and, if you use the approval rate rather than the rejection rate, mathematically).

I don’t know what will happen with the Bible study or the ministerial association. For me, the next step is to ask for a regular prayer meeting to be scheduled with the pastors at the ministerial association. We need both the power and the guidance of Jesus, the Lord of the church and our Head.

That’s catching up. In the next post, I will share my favorite passage from the early Christian writings. (I have more than one favorite, so I have other favorites to share in the future.)

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Rebuilding the Foundations: The Cross, the Resurrection, and the Foundation.

Posted on 11/26/2018 by

To be sure, the cross of Jesus Christ was an amazing place. I cannot do justice to its importance or to the unfathomable spiritual battle that happened there. The cross released us from all that had held us in bondage. There the fall of man was undone. Adam made us sinners at the tree of transgression; Jesus made us righteous at the tree of his obedience, the cross.

The resurrection was equally important. While he released our debts to the law with his cursed death on the cross and paid our ransom and redemption price with his blood, he made the release practical when he rose from the dead, leading captivity captive. He gave us resurrection life, a new creation, a new race as sons of God rather than sons of Adam. As we were baptized in the likeness of his death, released from our old man and our old life, so we were raised into newness of life.

We cannot compare the importance of the cross and the importance of the resurrection. Both were absolutely important, and there is no salvation without both.

That said, the following statement, which I found in the writings of a teacher I respect very much, is not true.

We are going to consider … that which is the essential foundation of the church, and that is the Cross. (T. Austin Sparks, The Lord’s Assembly: Part 2, ch. 1)

The cross is not the foundation of the Church. Jesus is the foundation of the Church (1 Cor. 3:11), and Jesus said he would build his Church on the rock of the confession that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God (Matt. 16:16-18). Jesus is the foundation, Peter was the first rock put upon it because he was the first to confess that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. As we each are given the same revelation by hearing the  good news that he is Christ, Lord, Judge, and Son of God, then we become rocks added to the foundation as well.

The crucifixion of God’s Son was the most important event in the history of the world, but its power is not contingent upon us believing in its power. Its power is contingent on our confessing that Jesus is Lord because we believe that God raised him from the dead (Rom. 10:9-13).

It is good to teach about the cross. It is not good to teach that the cross is foundation of the Church because it is not; Jesus is.

As usual, the rest of Mr. Sparks teaching has amazing truths in it that many of us never see. Nonetheless, when you get the foundation wrong, the teachings that you build off that wrong foundation will always be skewed, maybe a little or maybe a lot.

 

Posted in Rebuilding the Foundations | Tagged , ,

Rebuilding the Foundations: What is the Gospel?

Posted on 11/20/2018 by

Some writers struggle with writer’s block. My problem is having too many things to write about!

I have to finish Rome’s Audacious Claim. That is a priority.  The draft in 90% done, but there will be a lot of editing and rewriting, and I want to release it June 1. On the other hand, the “Rebuilding the Foundations” series, which I started on this blog, is really what is on my heart. It will be the next book after Rome’s Audacious Claim.

“Rebuilding the Foundations” is a series of teachings, though, and I am going to break it down into small bits so that others can teach it as well. Since I need to post regularly on this blog anyway, I will return to writing those small bits on this blog.

The first small bit is the Gospel.

Rebuilding the Foundations: What is the Gospel?

This foundation is based on four passages, though there are many more Old Testament prophecies and New Testament passages that could be cited.

Matthew 16:16-19

In this passage, Simon confesses that Jesus is “the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Jesus changes his name to Peter (Petros=Rock), tells him that he will build the church on him, and then makes several wonderful promises to him.

We all know that Jesus is the only foundation for the Christian and the Church (1 Cor. 3:11). Peter is not the foundation itself, but he is the first rock set upon the foundation of Christ. All the major branches of Christianity believe that Peter’s confession is also the rock.

If Peter’s confession is the rock as well, then Jesus is building his Church on it. If Jesus is building his Church on it, then we should too!

The other passages we will look at simply prove that the apostles preached the Gospel in such a way as to get their converts to make the same confession Peter made.

John 20:31

No explanation needed here. John said that he wrote his Gospel to get people to believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God, which was exactly Peter’s confession. Those who believe Peter’s confession have life through Jesus’ name.

Acts 2:36

Acts 2:36 is an example that is true of all the rests of the apostles’ preaching in Acts. Peter first proclaims that the Holy Spirit has arrived according to the prophecy of Joel. Then he preaches Jesus, telling the Jews first that they killed him, then that he rose from the dead, and finally calling all Israel to “know for certain” (NASB) that Jesus is “Lord and Christ.”

His whole sermon is based on the idea that the resurrection establishes Jesus as “Lord and Christ,” not exactly the same as “Christ, the Son of the Living God,” but the same idea and conclusion.

We learn from Acts 2:36 that it is not the exact terminology that matters. Believing that Jesus is the Messiah (Christ=Messiah) or Lord is the same as believing he is the Son of God because the Messiah is said to be the Son of God in Psalm 2:7 and the Lord in Psalm 110:1.

Romans 1:1-5

Here we see from Paul the same thing that we find in Acts 2 (and the rest of Acts). The goal of the apostles preaching was to get their hearers to believe that Jesus rose from the dead because this would prove that he is the Christ, the Son of the living God, the confession on which Jesus builds his Church.

“[He] was declared the Son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead,” Paul wrote (v. 4). He says that this is “the Gospel of God” (v. 1).

As a side note, in verse 5, Paul says that he is bringing about “obedience” to this faith. Our modern preaching to the lost is primarily based on the atonement, believing that Jesus died for our sins. While Jesus did die for our sins, one cannot “obey” faith in Jesus’ atonement. Faith that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, however, does call for obedience to Jesus, because the Christ is not just the Son of God. The Messiah also sits on the throne of David to rule God’s kingdom forever (Ps.  2:2,6,12; 110:1-2).

Romans 10:9-10

Again, much of evangelical Gospel preaching calls on hearers to believe that Jesus died for their sins and to confess that he is their Savior. Romans 10:9-10, though, says that salvation and righteousness come to those who confess Jesus as their Lord and who believe he rose from the dead. This is the rock upon which Jesus said he would build his Church.

This lines right up, obviously, with the other passages we have looked at. Our initial Gospel preaching should lead hearers to confess that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of the living God, proven to be so by his resurrection.

Summation

The Gospel contains much more than just the fact that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. This is evidenced by the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, all of which contain Jesus’ teaching, life, miracles, his death, his resurrection and some of what those things mean for us. Thus, the contain much more than just the confession that Jesus is the Christ. Jesus’ death for sins is not only true and important, it is part of the Gospel (1 Cor. 15:1-3).

Nonetheless, the purpose of our Gospel preaching should be to prove to the lost that Jesus is the resurrected Christ and Son of God, for it is by believing this, and then becoming obedient to that faith, that they will be saved. Jesus died for our sins, but believing that he died for our sins is not enough. It is through calling on him as the resurrected Lord of our lives that we are saved (Rom. 10:9-13).

Posted in Gospel, Rebuilding the Foundations | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

… And Then There Are People: A Story of Innocence, Impurity, Repentance, and Purity

Posted on 11/09/2018 by

Kingdom Christians.

It is a wonderful sounding term, and it is associated with several important scriptural doctrines.

  • There are two spiritual kingdoms. One is the kingdom of this world run by “the ruler of this world” (Jn. 12:31; 14:30) and “the prince of the power of the air” (Eph. 2:2). The whole world is under his sway (1 Jn. 5:19). The other is the kingdom of God’s beloved Son (Col. 1:13). Christians live as citizens, servants, and ambassadors of God’s kingdom (Php. 3:20; 2 Cor. 5:20).
  • The Gospel is the good news of a King, Jesus the Son of God, and the opportunity to enter his kingdom by repentance, faith, and baptism. (Many benefits are of course associated with entering God’s kingdom.)
  • Obedience to Jesus is an “of course” response to the Gospel because Jesus is King.

As wonderful as these things are, in many cases Kingdom Christianity has been associated with modern Anabaptist movements such as the Mennonites and Amish. This has resulted in an overemphasis on doctrines unique to that movement. Those are:

  • Modest dress (for both men and women)
  • No divorce and remarriage
  • Wearing head coverings (for women)

It is not wrong to address these issues. The complete disregard for these issues in most evangelical churches does call for reform, and thus for those who are willing to be bold reformers.

On the other hand, an overboard focus on these issues can lead to a problem Jesus talked about in Matthew 23:

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others” (Matt. 23:23, NASB)

Divorce and remarriage is a much more important subject than making sure one’s tithe includes the spices on the spice rack. Nonetheless, it is still wrong to exalt the strict wording of a teaching above “the weightier provisions of the law.” Justice and mercy and faithfulness trump strict, legal adherence to even valid teachings of Scripture.

As an example, the adulterous woman in John 8:3-11 should have been stoned to death according to the Law of Moses (Lev. 20:10). The man should have been brought to be stoned as well, but that is irrelevant to the current point. Jesus did not condone the stoning of the woman, but with wise words (“Let him who has no sin cast the first stone”) he saved her life and sent her away without condemnation and with a command to repent.

Strict, unbending adherence to the Law of Moses or even the commands of Jesus is highly commendable … until people show up.

As an example, I met a family–this is a true story–with ten children. The father and mother had been married for twenty years. The mother, however, had married as a teen on a whim. The marriage lasted seven days before the couple divorced.

Here they were, more than twenty years later, and the family was rejected in Anabaptist circles because of their teaching on divorce and remarriage. That rejection was based on a rigorous, but not righteous, adherence to the teachings of Jesus, it was based on a pharisaical rejection of justice, mercy, and faithfulness.

In dealing with the adulteress woman, Jesus was showing a principle I call “… and then there are people.”

In fact, a better word than people is persons. Real, live persons with real, live, and unusual experiences, such as the family mentioned above. Rigorous application of the words of Jesus sometimes mows such people under, leaving them to be trampled and ignored. Jesus was not like this. If he had to choose between people and the Law–” living oracles” (Acts 7:38)–he chose people.

We like to exegete  (expound upon or interpret) the Scriptures. They are letters on a page. They endure from generation to generation, and the curve balls thrown to us in certain odd verses do not bother us much. Generations before us have taken care of that for us, exploring them, and writing dozens of commentaries on them.

Jesus, however, exegeted God (Jn. 1:18). Our infinite God is not so easy to exegete as a 1200-page book; so Jesus came down and showed us his exegesis. He lived it out in front of us (Jn. 14:9ff). That exegesis of God ought to affect our exegesis of the Scriptures (Jn. 5:39-40).

Jesus’s exegesis of God was that he cares more about people than he does the Law of Moses. It was better for the women who had a flow of blood, and was thus unclean, to touch Jesus and be made whole than to obey the Law and stay away from him (and those she must pushed past in order to touch him).

Innocence, Impurity, Repentance, and Purity

It is a very cool principle that Jesus changed the flow of impurity. When the Law of Moses is applied, impurity flows from impure things and defiles pure ones. When Jesus arrives, however, purity flows from pure things and purifies impure ones. Even in the Old Testament, where we find pre-incarnate Jesus, the Only-Begotten Son, sitting on the throne in heaven (Jn. 12:40-41), Isaiah’s unclean lips do not make the coal from the altar impure. Rather, the coal purifies Isaiah’s lips. (Thank you, Bible Project, for pointing this out.)

Jesus explained with his life that God does not pitilessly reject the impure. He lovingly accepts the repentant, and lovingly and boldly rejects the self-righteous until they too repent.

If Jesus wanted innocent people in his Church, he would have seen to it that Adam and Eve were never tempted. He would never have allowed us to become sinners. He wants purified people in his Church. Purity is different than innocence, which is why the entrance requirement into his kingdom and his Church is repentance rather than righteousness.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Miscellaneous, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Inward Journey to the Release of the Spirit

Posted on 10/27/2018 by

The title of this post is the combination of the titles of the two books that have most changed my life and most marked my 36-year journey with King Jesus.

I read The Release of the Spirit by Watchman Nee during the first year I was a Christian. It taught me that I am a three-part being. I am a soul, and I communicate with the physical world with my body and the spiritual world with my spirit. The work of God is first from the inside working through his Spirit which has taken up his dwelling place in my spirit. Secondly, it is from the outside, where God controls all the circumstances of my life to get through the flesh and break open the hardness of my soul. The goal of this dual working is for the hardness of my soul to be broken open so that the light of Jesus might be revealed, shining from within my spirit, as unhindered as possible by my soul.

Watchman compared this work to a seed. When it is buried in the ground, the pressure of life growing from the inside along with the moisture and pressure on the outside breaks open the seed to release the life within.

I read The Inward Journey by Gene Edwards in my second year as Christian. I would suggest this is out of order because Gene describes the work of God in a Christian’s life while Nee carefully explains God’s working.

The Inward journey taught me what a difficult work God would have with me. It explains the need for suffering and pain in our lives so well that I came away longing to suffer more. (There is nothing wrong with this since it is a gift of God to us that we may not only believe in Jesus, but also suffer with him–Php. 1:29).

Edwards explained how hard I would have to work to prevent myself from fighting against the work of God. He made it clear that the most painful circumstances of my life were the ones most perfectly designed to transform the deepest, most hidden and secret places that I was hiding from God; the ones I most feared being brought to the light of day. The book reveals what frauds we are, deceiving the world around us to look good, trying to deceive God in the same way, and in the end thoroughly deceiving ourselves.

Whether you agree with those teachings or not, they made me a pliable Christian. They enabled me to go through the emotional trauma I desperately needed as a younger man and the two cancers and death of a son I experienced in my 50’s. I am 57 now, and I am more impressed and deeply at peace with God than I have ever been. I am more grateful than I have ever been, and I believe myself to be more pliable than I have ever been.

I love our Father in heaven, I give thanks for the amazing sacrifice, the amazing power that raised him from the dead, and the merciful call of Jesus his Son, and I long for even more of the work of the Spirit in my life. I thank our holy God for putting those books in my life early on to lay such a strong foundation in me.

I do need to make it clear that I am not endorsing all of Watchman Nee’s theology, and I am not endorsing Gene Edwards at all. Gene’s early books are great, and he is one of the best storytellers in the world, but I believe him to have departed from the path I want to be on (or want you to be on). Nonetheless, The Inward Journey has been a major foundation in my life.

Paul Pavao

Posted in Holiness | Tagged , , ,

Paul and Barnabas Encourage the Churches

Posted on 10/25/2018 by
The email Bible study I sent to the new converts at Rose Creek Village today:
This is a short study of Acts 14:21-23. It is prompted by my wondering what to tell a new Christian.
Acts 14:21 lets us know that Paul and Barnabas are finishing their first missionary journey, though Luke (the author of Acts) does not call it “first missionary journey.” We modern Christians call it that.
Now that their first journey is over, they want to go back and strengthen the churches. Obviously, they did not swing through and say only one sentence, but the Bible only records one sentence of what they said. It seems to me that sentence must be awful important!
Verse 22 gives the sentence: “It is through many tribulations [troubles] that we must enter the Kingdom of God.”
Here’s what I have to give you from verse 22. Remember, this is the only sentence that Luke thought important enough to write down from their visit to three churches.
1. Your Christian life is not meant to be easy or trouble-free; it is meant to be lived in the power and peace of Jesus, overcoming tribulation (cf. Jn. 16:33).
2. The Kingdom of God is what we are trying to eventually enter. You will find out, if you have not already, that we are already in the Kingdom of God (Col. 1:13). We are in the kingdom here, and by faith we can obtain and use its power, just as Jesus did, but on the Last Day we will inherit the kingdom (Matt. 25:34-40). At that point, the Kingdom of God will be the only rule on the earth, and we will be among the rulers if we suffer (2 Tim. 2:12). Don’t worry, though, God has promised to grant us suffering (Php. 1:29)
Those two points introduce you to several ideas. Also, if you are not familiar with Bible abbreviations, you will get used to them. Again, ask me if you do not understand any of those abbreviations.
Finally, verse 23 tells us that Paul and Barnabas appointed elders in those churches they visited. This means that for a while, those  churches functioned just fine without elders. It probably took a little time (in this case a few weeks) to have some standout people who could be trusted to preserve what Paul and Barnabas had taught them and to shepherd the flock.
Compared to modern Christianity (including RCV), it appears to me that Paul and Barnabas were more willing to trust the Holy Spirit to handle the disciples. On the other hand, they did not have all the counterfeits that we have today. They also checked on the churches regularly. Paul liked to write letters to them, which is to our benefit.
The churches founded by Paul and Peter were all led by a group of elders. Those elders were also called overseers. Nowadays, as a quirk of language, “overseer” has become “bishop.” Those first churches had many bishops, all also called elders. We will go more into that some time in the future.
For now, I want to encourage you with Paul and Barnabas that it is through many tribulations that we enter the Kingdom of God. Don’t lose heart. Fight your way forward. Equip yourself with the Word and fight valiantly.
With that exhortation, I guess the next email should be about the armor and weaponry of our spiritual warfare!
Posted in Bible, Leadership, missions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The Roman Catholic Church Changed the Ten Commandments

Posted on 10/11/2018 by

For some reason I do not think of it much, but the Roman Catholic Church changed the ten commandments. I have to suppose it was to try to hide from their members that bowing down in front of statues is idolatry.

I am not sure when they did this. It was probably in the late medieval period while they were putting people to death for translating the Bible into languages other than Latin.

You may be thinking this is an outrageous attack on the Roman Catholic Church, but it is simply fact. If you click this link, it will  take you to the Vatican web site. You will see three columns: the 10 commandments from Exodus, from Deuteronomy and the “Traditional Catechetical Formula.” The third column is the list as they teach to their members. The omission of the second commandment is obvious there, right on the Vatican web site. The way they turn the 10th commandment from Exodus into two commandments is not to split it down the middle, but to pluck a center part out.

Why would the only church in the world that bows and prays before statues remove the commandment that says not to make a graven image or bow down to it? 

No need to call a detective for that one. 

Really, it makes all the other unique claims of the Roman Catholic Church void, don’t you think?

I apologize if you think this post is rude or dripping with sarcasm, but this issue is off the charts outrageous. 

The Roman Catholic Church is the only church that does this:

That last site says, “Protestants, Jews, and Catholics number the commandments in slightly different ways,” but you will see the Protestants and Jews give them exactly the same way.

‘Nuff said.

Posted in Roman Catholic & Orthodox | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Real Church, Francis Chan, and the Roman Catholic Church

Posted on 10/10/2018 by

This was the newsletter I sent to my Christian-history.org newsletter list:

 
I was asked yesterday what I thought the best denomination was. I had a chance to address that at the “Heaven’s Family Reunion” in Pittsburgh in August. I focused on Hebrews 10:24-25.

One of the lines in that passage says that we should not forsake the assembling of ourselves together. Everyone knows that line, but it seems that almost no one knows what the rest of the passage says. What are we supposed to do instead of forsaking the assembling of ourselves together? Does the Scripture say, “Don’t forsake the assembling of yourselves together, but be sure to sit in a pew, hear a sermon, sing some songs, and help pay rent and salaries?”

You know it doesn’t, but I bet you don’t know what it does say to do.

That passage says that we should “know,” “consider,” or “understand” one another so that we can provoke one another to love and good works. The specific sentence says, “Not forsaking …, but exhorting…”

Exhorting is a big word in Greek, and Bibles translate the word “parakaleo” as beg, plead, comfort, console, exhort, and other similar words. It covers everything we can say to help a brother or sister walk in the will of God. A good definition of “exhort” might be found in 1 Thessalonians 5:14, where we read, “Warn the unruly, comfort the fainthearted, help the weak, be patient with everyone.”

When you assemble yourselves together, do you go to warn the unruly, comfort the fainthearted, help the weak, and be patient as you do so? Are you prepared to do these things because you have “considered” how your brothers and sisters are doing so that you can “provoke to love and good works”?

That is my answer to real church. “Pursue righteousness, faith, love, and peace along with those who call on the Lord out of a pure heart” is in the Bible, at 2 Timothy 2:22. These sorts of things are biblical commands, and they are what should be done rather than forsaking the assembling of ourselves together. There are no commands to go to Sunday school or listen to sermons every Sunday morning.

If your leaders have not trained you to do the work of ministry and edify the church, they have not done their job (Eph. 4:11-16). Until everyone is involved, we are not doing “real church.”

Those are my words and my teaching from Scripture, but Francis Chan has come out with some very similar teaching from the same passages. He recently released _Letters to the Church_ that talks about how he began to realize that his megachurch, Cornerstone, was not a biblical church. I would recommend the book.

Finally, I mentioned the Roman Catholic Church in the heading of this email. That’s because I only recently realized I had written a page on the origin of the RCC that I really like. Of course I really like it because I wrote it, but I also wrote my Roman Catholicism page, and I don’t like it. I am going to completely change it soon.You can read the good page at https://www.christian-history.org/when-did-roman-catholicism-begin.html.

Grace, peace, and mercy to you as you focus your life on the divine Son of the living God, Jesus Christ our Savior.

 

Posted in Bible, Church, Modern Doctrines, Roman Catholic & Orthodox | Tagged , , , ,