Can the Gates of Hell Prevail Against the Church

Roman Catholics are constantly telling me that Matthew 16:18—"The gates of hell shall not prevail against [the church]"—is proof that the church did not fall in the 4th century, like I say it did.

Wishful Thinking

It’s amazing how much of our theology is based on wishful thinking. When the Roman Catholics absurdly assert that the church could not have fallen, even though it obviously did, they are not doing anything unusual. The Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, Protestants, and you and me are likely to behave exactly the same way.

We all have things we wish were true, and we argue like school children trying to make people believe we have solid evidence for those things.

The people who cling to truth are those who know how prone they are to wishful thinking and can despise the pain of self-denial.

Either that, or you can just hope you’re lucky and you grew up or were converted in the right denomination.

The church fell, whether the Roman Catholic Church likes it or not. Facts are facts, and asserting that something is impossible when it clearly happened is irrational.

So what in the world did Jesus mean?

Gates as Offensive Weapons

Now I don’t know about you, but I’ve never heard of gates being used as weapons.

Even Samson, when he tore the gates off the city of Gaza (Judges 16:1-3), just ran away with them. He didn’t kill any Philistines with them, nor use them as weapons in any other way.

Gates are defensive structures.

Surely if the gates of hell are not going to prevail against the church, it’s because the church is assailing them. Seems kind of obvious, doesn’t it?

Tradition

It’s amazing, too, how much we’re all influenced by what we’ve been told all our lives.
When I mentioned this passage in a teaching last week, two old-timers—tried and true, long-time Scripture lovers—told me they’d never heard this teaching before.
They wouldn’t need this teaching if tradition didn’t have us in a headlock. They’d have come to it on their own. I didn’t get this on my own, either. I read it somewhere a couple decades ago. Otherwise, I’d be blindly applying the nonsensical RCC interpretation, too.

So the idea of Matthew 16:18 is not that the church won’t fall. The idea is that when and where the church exists, she will assail the gates of Hades and bring back the dead.

The Greek there is Hades. There’s several NT words for hell, and Hades is a reference to the place where the dead are. It’s very general, so it can mean the grave as well as the place where the rich man, Lazarus, and Abraham were (Luke 16:19-31).

One of our jobs as Christians is, of course, to rescue those who are dead in their trespasses and sins. Thus, we need to destroy the gates that keep them in Hades.

If we’ll join forces, giving up our divisions—that we like to more pleasantly call denominations, since our imperfect English translations neglect to tell us those will send us to hell like divisions will—then we’ll be able to tear those gates down.

If we don’t … well, then, we’ll just be more proof I can use to unwisely try to convince Roman Catholics of the obvious.

 

Posted in Bible, Church, History, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Brand Loyalty to Christ

An old friend once talked about a terrible motel room he slept in. It smelled so bad that he slept with the soap from the bathroom tucked under his nose as a deodorizer. The next time he went to a motel, he looked for a "Great Western" sign.

The "Great Western" sign meant something.

It was a brand, and brands say things. "Great Western" says "inexpensive, clean, and well-maintained."

An even better example is Apple, Google, and Microsoft.

In the long run, Microsoft cannot win its battles with Apple and Google because of brand. "Microsoft" means rich, greedy, glitches, and updates that are not improvements. Apple means innovative and reliable. Google adds "free" to innovative and reliable.

So how does this apply to Christianity?

Brands of Christianity

I saw an excellent post called Let Them Eat Cake! today. It was on brands of Christianity. It is an innovative, stinging commentary on the brand of "Sola," an obvious reference to the Protestant Reformation solas—sola gratia, sola scriptura, and sola fide.

It does an excellent job of pointing out the shortcomings of sola scriptura (Scripture only).

It falls short in the most important area, though. If sola scriptura is not producing "brand recognition" of the original faith, then what does?

They don’t address this. I’m supposing that we’re to assume they’re referring to tradition-based Christianity such as Roman Catholicism or Orthodoxy.

The problem is, Roman Catholic tradition and Orthodoxy do produce a brand you can recognize.

They reliably produce worldliness, carnality, idolatry, and an indifference to the commands of Christ.

That’s not a brand I intend to be loyal to, nor make the first purchase from.

My Take on Properly Branded Christianity

I’m just cutting and pasting the comment I made on their blog …

Unfortunately, it’s not just Evangelicals who don’t have the original packaging. In fact, I’d say it’s clear they have far more of it than more traditional Christians.

The original packaging can be found in Titus 2, where Paul describes sound doctrine.

It can be found in 2 Tim. 2:19, where Paul says that the foundation involves departing from iniquity.

Scripture–whether it is sola or not–was given to equip the saints for every good work (2 Tim. 3:16-17). At the judgment seat, we will be judged for our works, not for our opinion on the presence of the Lord in the Eucharist or our understanding of baptism.

If your doctrine doesn’t produce people who turn the other cheek, don’t return insult for insult, who stay faithful to their spouses, who love and give, and who are not friends with the world … well, then you can argue your doctrines from Scripture, tradition, or whatever else you want, and your doctrine, correct or incorrect, will be useless.

Justin Martyr described Christians of his day—A.D. 150—as people who formerly pursued wealth, but now shared everything; who formerly were sexually immoral, but who now lived in purity; who formerly hated, but now shared the same fire with men of other tribes and prayed for their persecutors.

That’s the brand of Jesus Christ—unity, love, righteousness, peace, joy, and power with God.

The rest is useless words, and of those the kingdom of God does not consist (1 Cor. 4:20).

Posted in Church, Gospel, History, Holiness, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Catching Up …

I haven’t written a blog post here in almost 3 weeks. It’s not from lack of things to write about.

Quite the opposite. There’s been LOTS to write about, but I’ve been so busy doing it that I haven’t been writing. I’ve barely had time to answer emails, even business ones.

Cow Brain Removal

First, I learned how to remove a cow brain from a cow skull. (Don’t go there unless you don’t mind seeing some gross pictures.)

Don’t worry. It was for my daughter’s science project, not some religious ritual.

Preaching the Gospel

Then we went to California to talk to people about the church.

It was an amazing time. God really opened some doors, and we learned some things about our own inadequacy, God’s sufficiency, and the power of prayer.

The most exciting thing to me is when God’s revelation comes, and the light turns on.

You can see it in a person’s face. It can be shocking, but often when the Gospel of the kingdom comes—that we’re a nation of priests, ruled by God, not just individuals struggling along—then the love of God accompanies it, and it’s warm, drawing, and powerful.

We have to keep praying. Just because someone heard the Word of God with power does not mean that they’ll hold onto it and give themselves to it. The devil is always looking for opportunity to steal away the seed or to choke out a new plant. He is not going to stand for seeing a real church, a gathering of committed—however weak they may be, they are committed—disciples … because the gates of hell will never prevail against them. They will snatch the elect from his grip.

More later …

Posted in Church, Gospel, Miscellaneous, news | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Born-Again Bible Reading: A Thought for Discussion

Below is an email I sent to a dear friend this morning concerning "parsimony" in Scripture interpretation. I believe all of it is true, but rather than explain why, I thought I’d initiate a little discussion.

Parsimony: Adoption of the simplest assumption in the formulation of a theory or in the interpretation of data

My friend had written:

I’m starting to find that there’s a lot to the whole parsimony thing. I had been raised with complex answers to so many questions about the scriptures, but the simplest, (and often hardest to swallow and walk in faith in) is usually the right interpretation. ie: Jesus, Paul, James, John… they simply meant what they said.

My Response

I was thinking about that this morning.

The “born-again” crowd is given a few teachings that are not to be questioned. Then they read the Bible and the very books that supposedly produced those teachings–Romans, Galatians, Ephesians–are confusing, almost incomprehensible from a fundamentalist interpretation. Christians then just get used to the cognitive dissonance. “I believe the Bible. The Bible has all sorts of verses that I really don’t believe. Here’s the verses I use to ignore those verses. I believe the Bible is the infallible, inerrant Word of God.”

Parsimony destroys the entire fundamentalist system. It rips their most important doctrines to shreds.

On the other hand, after some years of reading the Bible parsimoniously and getting your beliefs bulldozed, all the Scriptures begin to fall right into place so beautifully that it’s breathtaking.

It’s a lot like having a scratch-off game card. As you scratch more and more off, you begin to see the prize.

Posted in Bible, Gospel, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Commenting on the Psalms

I love the Psalms.

Sometimes I’m scared to start reading them because I can get so caught up in the message of just one Psalm. It’s amazing the truths that are laying there, just under the surface, for the person willing to dig for them and to get used to interpreting the Psalms.

It’s not just general truths about God you’ll find there. I wonder if the whole message of the New Testament couldn’t be reproduced from prophecies and spiritual statements in the Psalms.

I did another commentary on a Psalm yesterday, Psalm 73.

I wanted to share it with you. Just follow the link.

I also did a shorter one on Isaiah 35:8-10.

Posted in Bible | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Answered Prayer Revisited

This morning my warehouse manager, Dean, came in to tell me that his mom had just called from Sacramento shouting, "I’m healed, I’m healed."

A few weeks ago, a set of shelves (installed by her and her husband) fell off her bathroom wall onto her. As she lay on the floor, seconds later, her sister called from Florida, not a very common occurrence. She took the call, slurring her words, barely conscious, and her sister yelled at her over the phone, trying to keep her awake.

The sister instructed Dean’s mom to call the next-door neighbor and that she’d call back in 2 minutes. The next door neighbor, fortunately enough, was up and dressed, which was unusual for her at 8 a.m. (I guess she’s an artist or something, Dean said.)

The neighbor called 911, and the EMT team showed up in 2 minutes. They found her unconscious, and they had to hit her with a defibrillator 3 times to get her heart going.

They got it going, but Dean’s mom was left with numerous stroke symptoms: weakness on one side, slurred, slow speech, and she had difficulty reading and writing. She also couldn’t handle light, needing sunglasses outside. She was weak and tired.

Recovery has been very slow for weeks, and two weeks ago I let Dean off for a few days to go visit her.

Apparently, his mom decided yesterday that she needed more prayer, and she went to see a friend at a charismatic, non-denominational church she attends. Her friend prayed for her yesterday, and today she woke up symptomless. No pain, no slurred speech, no weakness, and her reading and writing ability is back to normal.

Does This Happen All the Time?

No. A lot of people don’t get healed. I have another friend who works for me whose mom did have a stroke, and though she’s almost completely well, she had no miraculous healing, and she still has some effects of it.

Dramatic stories like this happen rarely, at least in my experience.

I’ve seen only a couple such things. Friends in foreign countries–friends I know are honest–have told me many more. There’s a lot of unbelief in the US, and we’re already inundated with the message of Christ. Where the message is new and the unbelief is less, God seems more prone to displaying miraculous power (Matt. 13:58).

However, I could tell a hundred less dramatic stories, and I’ve forgotten many times that. I remember, for example, getting up one morning during a drought here convinced God wanted us to pray for an end to the drought. At our gathering that morning, I asked everyone to pray, and one of the ladies said, "Can we pray the rain starts Tuesday? We’re taking my students to the zoo on Tuesday."

The rain began as they were in the parking lot leaving the zoo. That was in the late Spring of 2007 or 2008, I don’t remember which.

One of the things that builds my faith the most is how often I know, before I ever pray, whether there’s power in our prayers. It’s not that we simply prayed for a drought to end. I’m sure we did before that Sunday, and it didn’t happen. But when we were led to pray, and we prayed, it happened.

Posted in prayer | Tagged | 1 Comment

The Righteousness of God

I’ve named several posts the Righteousness of God (I think). How could I describe the righteousness of God in one post? In fact, how could I describe the righteousness of God at all?

In the end, the righteousness of God is displayed in the lives of spiritual people. What I am about to write is not just the product of reading Scripture. It is the product of reading the lives of the saints of God.

And their lives are every bit as much the Word of God as the Scriptures are.

This was originally an email; however, Jennie has been asking a question about my separating faith and works when I talk about the judgment and going to heaven. She’s concerned—rightly—about my doing so because for the Christian, good deeds are the product of walking with God. They’re not separated from faith.
I’m hoping this will adequately answer the question.

God’s righteousness

We don’t know very much about righteousness/doing good. Most of what we think is doing good isn’t.

Well … maybe not most, but a lot.

Part of the reason we abandon our own righteousness (Rom. 10:3-4; Php. 3:8-15) is so that God can create his.

His righteousness is undefinable.

The Scripture defines it in very general terms by saying the “the fruit of the Spirit is” and “against such things there is no law” (Gal. 5:22-23).

We don’t follow a law because if we do the law becomes our guide rather than the Spirit being our guide.

If the Spirit is our guide, he is able to begin working a righteousness in us that is the product both of changing us and showing us what to do. Each of those things produce different results. When he’s leading us, and we do what we feel from him, then we do acts of righteousness. When he’s changing us, we begin to do acts of righteousness we don’t even know about. We are simply kinder, easier to be around, more encouraging, and more convicting … mostly without our knowledge.

The result of a spiritual righteousness is that you never feel adequate in yourself. You always wonder why God has mercy on you, but you know he is having mercy on you because your relationship with him is peaceful, growing, and good.

No law could produce such a righteousness. When you obey the law, you know you’re righteous.

Well … you think you are. Paul said before he met Christ he was “blameless” according to the Law. After he met Christ he realized he was the chief of sinners, the ultimate example of someone undeserving of the mercy of God.

Big difference in how he saw himself, no?

When the Spirit produces righteousness, you live like that. Your confidence in facing the judgment is that you know him. The Spirit bears witness with your spirit that you are the child of God (Rom. 8:16). You know, deeply and fully, that when you sin you have an advocate with the Father (1 Jn. 2:1). You feel the love and mercy of God. Your gratefulness grows, your fear of displeasing him–and even of being judged by him for disobedience–grows, and your righteousness grows without pride.

This is the path. God doesn’t need you to be at the end of it. He’ll get you to the end of it. He just wants you to stay on it. You are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works that he has prepared beforehand to do (Eph. 2:10).

The Judgment and Previous Posts

Correcting the commonly held false beliefs about the judgment means reminding Christians that there is one (Rom. 14:10; 2 Cor. 5:10). It means telling them that it’s according to works and that they ought to fear (1 Pet. 1:17).

However, correcting false beliefs about the judgment is one narrow part of God’s plan. If it’s all you look at, then you will think you need to trust in yourself and your obedience for righteousness.

That will not work. That’s just a good way to find out Romans 7 is true.

You do need to obey. You do need to fear. But you need to await the hope of the righteousness which comes by faith (Gal. 5:5). That’s a real, lived-out righteousness (1 Jn. 3:7), but it nonetheless comes by faith, imparted by the grace of God (Rom. 6:14).

Stay on the path. That’s our biggest job, our ultimate work of righteousness (Jn. 15:1-5). It is God who is committed in Jesus Christ to getting you to the end of it (Php. 2:13; 1 Cor. 1:7-9; Jude 24).

Posted in Gospel, Holiness, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

1 Corinthians 3 and Works Burned Up By Fire

As long as we’re talking about works, I need to put one more myth to rest.

1 Corinthians 3:15 says, "If any man’s work is burned, he shall suffer loss, but he himself shall be saved, but so as through fire."

That passage is talking about ministry. The works involved there are teaching and building the church. If a teacher builds the church poorly; if he builds wood, hay, and stubble, he won’t be sent to hell for being a bad teacher and bad church builder. He will be saved, yet so as through fire.

Read the chapter. That’s the context. It’s very clear.

The passage is not about works like feeding the hungry and clothing the naked. If you turn a deaf ear to the hungry, thirsty, naked, imprisoned, and sick, then you will go into the lake of fire (Matt. 25:31-46). You will not be saved so as through fire; you will be lost so as through fire.

If you practice drunkenness, adultery, division, envy, greed, selfish ambitions and such things, then you will not be saved so as through fire, you will be told by Christ that he does not know you, whether your ministry was successful or not, whether you cast out demons or not, and whether you worked miracles or not.

1 Corinthians 3 is about workers in the church and their teaching. Thank God that those of us who teach do not have our salvation on the line when we teach. Nonetheless, we do not wish to have all our work burned up, as we will lose all our rewards.

If, however, we live like the world, greedily pursuing our own gain, we will be judged like the world, and we will be condemned along with all liars, cowards, idolaters, and unbelievers (Rev. 21:8).

By the way, I don’t teach these things because they’re fun or I like them. I teach them because that’s what the Bible says, and it is inappropriate for us to dance around what the Bible says because we have a 500-year-old doctrine that we have elevated to divinely-inspired status.

Posted in Gospel, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

A Quick Overview of Salvation

I’ve been needing to write something short like this for a long time …

Salvation comes in two steps.

  1. Deliverance from slavery to sin and the living death it produces: This comes by faith alone. We are born again, made new creatures, given the Spirit, and delivered from sin and empowered for holiness by grace.
  2. Entrance to Christ’s everlasting kingdom: This is a reward for good works and doing the will of the Father. Faith is not taken into account, only the works that you have done in obedience to God and conscience. If you are saved by faith, you will by greatly aided by God in that obedience.

There it is, short and simple. The fact is, the Scriptures line up neatly when you see salvation as two steps in this way.

Testing Those Steps Scripturally

Describing salvation in this way terrifies Evangelicals. I was going to say it stumbles them, but that’s not true. Their own doctrine stumbles them and causes the majority of them to be unsaved. That is, they do not have grace giving them power over sin, and they do not have grace teaching them to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts. Instead, most Evangelicals are still slaves to sin, and many of them aren’t even bothered by it.

Not all of them, just most.

If you don’t know the Scriptures well enough to compare them to those two steps, then you can go through my pages on salvation at the Rest of the Old Old Story.

If you do know the Scriptures well enough, just go through them on your own. The things Paul said and James said both fit neatly into the steps I gave above.

You’ll need a better description of the atonement than "Jesus paid the penalty for your sins," though. That’s coming soon. Suffice it to say that if you search for something in the Scriptures saying "Jesus paid the penalty," you’re in for a long search. Most passages fit much better into the ideas expressed in Romans 8:3-4.

Posted in Gospel, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , | 13 Comments

Judgment & Eternal Life

A comment was left on my last post about the judgment. A decent answer is far too long to leave as a comment, so here’s my response.

Please note that rather than quote long sections of her comment and whole verses she quoted, I’m going to summarize to help keep this post a little shorter.

Your post on judgment made me think of two verses. John 5:24 says that if we believe we have eternal life and won’t come into judgment. 1 Thess. 4:15-18 says that believers are raptured. They are either not judged at all, or this is a judgment showing they are not condemned but belong to Christ.

I have to answer those two verses separately.

John 5:24

John writes much differently than Paul. In the end, the basic message is exactly the same, but the way of saying it is different. John always speaks of eternal life as a present possession. Paul always speaks of eternal life as a future reward (e.g., Rom. 6:22).

Only their terminology is different. The life we receive from Christ upon believing is just called life by Paul, while it is called eternal life by John.

John, however, is every bit as clear as Paul about works and about the judgment.

First, while John quotes Jesus as saying that the one who believes has eternal life, know for certain what John means by believing. John says that if a person claims to know God but doesn’t keep his commands, then that person is a liar (1 Jn. 2:3-4). He says that a righteous person is someone who practices righteousness, and he tells us not to be deceived about that (1 Jn. 3:7).

Second, John talks about judgment a lot, and he says the same things about judgment that he says about eternal life. The difference is what people do.

If we want to "assure our hearts before him," we must love (1 Jn. 3:18-19). If we want to have confidence at the judgment, we must love and we must walk as Christ walked (4:15-18).

So John’s very clear about what it means to be safe at the judgment. Your faith had better produce good works. If good works aren’t being produced, then John tells you repeatedly to assume you do not believe, you do not know God, and you are not his child.

That’s not because he wants to condemn you! That’s because he wants you to have real faith!

That’s nothing different than what James says in James 2.

1 Thess. 4:15-18

Like I said in my comment, this passage comes to my mind, too. Obviously, those who are caught up to be with Christ forever are already judged by God to be Christ’s. They have an eternal reward.

Of course, this isn’t really any different than Matthew 25 or Revelation 20. In both cases, everyone is gathered before Christ, but he already knows who has an eternal reward and who has condemnation. The sheep and goats are already divided when Christ sits down on his glorious throne in Matthew 25. The sheep are at his right, and the goats are on his left.

In Revelation 20, there’s a Book of Life. Whoever is not found written in it is cast into the lake of fire.

That book is not only in Revelation 20. It’s only in Revelation 3. Jesus warns the church of Sardis to repent, and he says that those who overcome will not have their name blotted out of the Book of Life. The tie to Revelation 20 is obvious.

So your point that God and Jesus know in advance who has eternal life and who does not is accurate. Jesus can return and catch up his own to be with him because he already knows who he is.

But those who are his are not all those who claim to be Christians. John himself makes that clear. He tells the church that some left and those who left never belonged to Christ (1 Jn. 2:19). While they were there, since they never belonged to him, had Christ returned, others would have been caught up to meet the Lord in the air, but those described in 1 Jn. 2:19 would not have been snatched up.

John 5:24 and John 5:28-29

Your point, about those who are in Christ avoiding judgment, seems to be backed up by the rest of John 5:24-29 as well.

This is an interesting passage. In v. 25, "the dead" hear the voice of Christ. In verse 28, those who are "in the graves" hear the voice of Christ. Ordinarily, these would seem to be the same people, but I think anyone who has read John can look at that passage and know they are different.

"The dead" are those who are dead in their sins. Those who are in the graves are those who died physically. The former, when they hear the voice of Christ and believe are given life, and they avoid judgment. The latter, when they hear the voice of Christ, are judged by their works.

I’m looking at that and thinking it would be very difficult to interpret those verses any other way.

That’s not really a problem for two reasons …

  • 1 John says repeatedly that the only true believers are those who are doing good works (see above).
  • All the passages on the judgment make it clear that each person’s judgment is known in advance.

So How Does All This Apply to Us?

Whether the judgment is discussed Jesus’ way, John’s way, Paul’s way, or Peter’s way, the answer is the same.

Jesus tells us that those who will enter his kingdom are those who do his Father’s will (Matt. 7:21). When he has to admonish the churches, he tells them to repent, do good works, and overcome (Rev. 2:1 – 3:22).

Peter tells us to fear the judgment (1 Pet. 1:17) and to be diligent to make our calling and election sure by adding to our faith virtue, knowledge, self-control, perseverance, godliness, brotherly kindness, and good works (2 Pet. 1:5-11).

Paul tells us to walk by the Spirit, saying that those who walk by the flesh will die (Rom. 8:12) and reap corruption (Gal. 6:8). He compares walking by the Spirit to doing good (Gal. 6:7-9). He also says that eternal life is the end of holiness, which is the product of freedom from sin and servitude to God (Rom. 6:22).

John tells us that if we want to have confidence in the day of judgment, we must love and be as Christ is in the world (1 Jn 4:17-18). He tells us that the way we will be able to determine whether we know God or not is by whether we keep his commands (1 Jn. 2:3-4).

The Judgment for Christians

Paul says we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ to receive the deeds done in the body, whether good or bad. Peter says that if we address God as Father, the one who impartially judges according to each one’s work, then we should conduct ourselves throughout the time of our sojourning here in fear (1 Pet. 1:17).

They both seem to be suggesting very clearly that we should expect a judgment.

Perhaps the best answer to all of this is that whether we are judged right here on earth or judged at the same time as others at the end of time, we are nonetheless judged according to our works.

Again, take a look at Jesus’ letters to the churches in Rev. 2 & 3. There is little doubt that he is judging those churches according to their works. Those that he found lacking, he warns. And his warnings ring of eternal judgment, not temporal punishment. Every reward for the overcomers is something for the afterlife.

You mentioned the judgment of the sheep and the goats. I believe that passage is talking about a judgment of living people who are on earth when Christ returns. … I don’t believe those who were in the first resurrection before the millenium will be judged for salvation.

Those who are part of the first resurrection are those who are martyred for Christ. Martyrs are mentioned twice in Revelation as being in heaven before the judgment, once in Rev. 6:9-11 and once in Rev. 20:4-5. In chapter six they are told to wait for others to be martyred, which would be those mentioned in Rev. 20:4-5.

Anyone who has read the early Christian writings cannot miss the respect early Christians had for those who gave their lives for Christ. Although the early Christians believed that even Christians went to a paradise—the same place referred to as Abraham’s bosom in the story of Lazarus and the rich man—they did not believe martyrs went there. Martyrs got to bypass the judgment. They went straight to heaven.

Even Ignatius, who wrote his letters around A.D. 110, believed that. This is significant, since the apostle John appointed him to be the head elder of the apostle Paul’s home church.

It seems like a guy like that would have pretty reliable theology.

As far as Matthew 25 goes, there’s nothing to indicate that this is only those alive when Jesus returns. But even assuming that it is, it really doesn’t change anything.

The question I’m trying to address is, do the works of Christians matter?

Everything we read suggests they do. Thus, it is safe to say that our doctrine of salvation by faith alone—the doctrine as it is taught by most Evangelicals—is false.

We have misinterpreted Paul’s words on salvation by faith alone, and we have applied those words in ways that contradict Paul’s own teachings on the judgment. Our interpretation has caused us to dance jigs around passages like Galatians 6:7-10 and many, many other verses.

I have a couple long pages addressing that issue at Christian History for Everyman. One addresses faith alone, and the other addresses salvation more generally.

I have several articles addressing the various details of the doctrine of salvation on my Rest of the Old, Old Story web site.

However, I’m about to write a very short version of those pages for my next post.

Posted in Gospel, History, Holiness, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments