The Bible’s Contradictions and Errors Are Inspired

In this post, I am not arguing against the Bible, but for it. If we believe the Bible is inspired by God himself, we should receive its words as they are rather than as we wish they were. When you deny the contradictions and errors in the Bible, you are not defending it but changing the message God sent to us.

I have been reading through the Gospels, and once again the contradictions between the birth stories in Matthew and Luke stand out. Matthew has Joseph and Mary living in Bethlehem. When the wise men arrive, they go to Joseph’s house, not to a manger. When they leave without visiting Herod, Herod has all the children under 2 years old in Bethlehem put to death. Joseph and Mary avoid this by going to Egypt. When Herod dies, they return to Israel, but when they find out Herod’s son is reigning, they go to Nazareth. This prompts Matthew to say that this trip to Nazareth fulfills a prophecy, one which is unknown to us, that Jesus would be called a Nazarene.

Luke, on the other hand, has Joseph and Mary living in Nazareth when she become pregnant. They only go to Bethlehem because of a census. The census is another historical item that is unknown to us. The census Luke describes happened in A.D. 16, some 20 years after Jesus was born. After he is born, they wait the requisite 33 days to offer their sacrifices, and then they go back to Nazareth.

There is no reconciling these two stories despite all the efforts to do so. Christian historians have looked under every rock to find historical evidence that there was a census ordered by Quirinius during Herod’s reign. They’ve found nothing more than speculation.

Most pastors and teachers will never bring up these facts to you, but I love and honor and believe the Bible more than they do. I will not change it, not even to be delicate with your faith. I want to believe, and I want you to believe, the Bible as God gave it to us. If you do, here is what you can learn.

The Bible is not for carnal minds. God was not and is not trying too get hardened, lost souls to be so impressed by the scientific and historical accuracy of the Bible that they have to believe. The Bible is for spiritual minds. It is infused with spiritual truths that rush into the heart of his own and burst forth in revelation and power. That power drives away sin and produces obedience. The Bible was written so that we can be “thoroughly equipped for every good work,” not so that we can get a theology degree.

In the early third century, Origen was widely regarded as the greatest Christian teacher of his time. He had this to say about “impossibilities and incongruities” in the Bible:

But if in all instances of this covering the logical connection and order of the Law had been preserved, we would certainly not believe … that anything else was contained in it except what was indicated on the surface. So for that reason, Divine Wisdom took care that certain stumbling blocks—interruptions—to the historical meaning would take place. He did this by introducing into the middle [of the narratives] certain impossibilities and incongruities. (De Principiis, Bk. IV, ch. 1, par. 14)

Origen’s argument is that God does not want to reveal the deep mysteries of his word to lazy Christians, but only to those hungry to learn. Thus, he introduces a historical narrative impossibilities and contradictions in the text to indicate to the spiritual and diligent that we need to dig deeper and find the the spiritual mysteries God wants us to know.

The reality we must face is that as hard as Christians and their pastors, theologians, and scholars have tried, there is no sensible way to reconcile the birth stories in Matthew and Luke. Origen (and I) would argue that this is not a mistake that you need to help God correct. You should accept the Bible for what it is, not what you wish it were. God has something deeper or more to tell us than where Joseph and Mary lived before he was born.

I would suggest that he wants us to understand the fullness of what Joseph and Mary went through. I think he wanted us to focus on the fact that Jesus is the Savior of the wise and ignorant alike. The wise may seek him by signs, by research, by insight. The poor and ignorant, on the other hand, get a majestic revelation from heavenly messengers glowing with unearthly light.

Jesus focused on the poor, declaring that revealed his praise through babies and nursing children. He confounded the wise, and Paul announced that God uses the foolish of the world to confound the wise (1 Cor. 1:27). The rich and wise can seem to be left out, and in the Epistle of James can even seem to be condemned. Matthew’s birth story, though, gives hope that if the wise are diligent, and if they can divest themselves of their riches for the Christ, then they too can be saved (cf. Matt. 19:23-26).

There is probably much more to be discovered beneath the contradicting birth stories of Matthew and Luke but, unfortunately, I have little help in finding it because my brothers and sisters are wasting their time trying to rectify historical details that God has no regard for.

We must not be so faithless as to think that we must hide or be deceitful in order to defend God or the Scriptures. We do not.

Posted in Bible, Dealing with Scripture Honestly | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Interpreting Paul’s Epistle to the Romans

I wrote this on Facebook today:

How can you correctly interpret Romans if you don’t believe its foundational precepts? “Those who practice such things are worthy of death” (1:32) and “to those who by perseverance in well-doing seek for glory, honor, and incorruptibility, [God will repay” eternal life” (2:7).

Romans is about the miraculous provision God makes to turn sinners into obeyers, not the way Jesus turned his Father from justice to mercy.

God’s justice and mercy were always perfect. He did not and does not need salvation. We, on the other hand, practice such things as are worthy of death, so Jesus ransomed and purchased us so that we could be created in Christ Jesus (Eph. 2:10) to persevere in well-doing.
Romans 14:9: “For to this end Christ died, rose, and lived again, that he might be Lord of both the dead and the living.”

In between 2:7 and 14:9, Paul did not switch to the subject of saving us from God’s justice by appeasing his wrath. No, we can only appease God’s wrath by Christ living in us throughout our lives (Rom. 5:9-10; Eph. 5:3-7).

Maybe the best way to try to verify what I have written here is to read Romans 8:1-13, but chapters 5 and 6 are clear on this matter as well.

Posted in Bible, Dealing with Scripture Honestly, Gospel, Modern Doctrines, Verses Evangelicals Ignore | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

News and New Articles

It’s been a minute since I updated this blog. Today I’ll give you the links for my most recent Christian-history.org posts and news about things I’m doing.

New Articles on Christian-history.org

A few weeks ago, I posted “I Desire Mercy and Not Sacrifice”. I also made it a book. I tested out Kindle’s new AI audio book maker as well. I liked the AI voice well enough, though I was not able to get it to pronounce everything perfectly, nor always emphasize the right words in sentences. Maybe someone who can get it for free with their audible account can let me know how it sounds. (I published the paperback, too, but then unpublished it because it costs too much in its current form.)

For those of you who write, listening to that AI voice was a great help with editing. Typos stood out, and it was easy to notice sentences that needed to be worded better.

I also wrote “A Primer on Salvation from Sin, Wrath, and Evangelical Theology, Part 1.” I really struggled with whether to use the provocative title, but in the end, I thought it was accurate. So I went with it. It is much shorter than “I Desire Mercy and Not Sacrifice.”

On the other hand, “Can I Lose My Salvation” is longer than the “Mercy” article! It too will become a book. It will be the second in a series of booklets called “Teachings That Must Not Be Lost.” I am working on the draft of “The Tradition About Tradition” (working title) as well. It should be the third in that series followed by a booklet on the Law of Moses for Christians.

News

It definitely appears that my old URL, ancient-faith.com, is lost forever. I have made my peace with that. I also lost all my 2022 and 2023 posts, but the “Wayback Machine” can find them so I can download and repost them.

I am making an attempt to start a theology/discipleship course. I have rented a booth at an indoor flea market locally. I am going to sell my books and a few others there. Mostly, though, I am going to do my best to market the teachings that are in my book Rebuilding the Foundations, and advertise the course. Hopefully, I will get 3 or 4 people to want to take the course and help me develop it. I much prefer the question and answer teaching method or discussion method anyway, so we can develop the course together lesson by lesson as we learn. After that, I’ll publish the course on my web site and on YouTube.

That is the plan anyway. I feel like the best thing I have to offer is an honest approach both to interpreting the Bible and to examining myself as a Christian. The best way to communicate those two things are in person. It is not uncommon for people that I teach in person to comment on how honestly I research and for them to “relax and be real” about where they are in Christ so they can go forward in devotion and submission to him.

For those of you who still follow this blog, stay in touch! Comment and question as much as you would like. I often have great conversations by email (paul@christian-history.org) with readers.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Jesus Triumphantly Rescued Us! Atonement by Ransom

From a comment I put on Facebook:

It was not until yesterday that I realized the full import of Ephesians 1:7 and Colossians 1:14. Both are saying we have been released because we were ransomed by his blood (Gr. apolutrosis), so that we now have aphesis (release/deliverance of) our trespasses. There’s a cool part about this I’ll put lower in this post.

The import of those Old Testament passages I gave (1 Sam. 15:22; Hos. 6:6; Ps. 51:16-17; Micah 6:6-8) is that God has always forgiven the righteous their occasional stumblings. Not many of us, however, were righteous, so God gave his Son to ransom us out of our slavery to sin (as described best, I think, in Ephesians 2:1-3). The purpose was mainly to make us righteous, and the result is that as people who do good, we are among the blessed to whom God does not impute sin (Ps. 32:2; Rom. 4:1-8).

According to Psalm 32:2, those are the people in whose spirit there is no deceit. This aligns will with 1 John 1:7ff, where those who walk in the light–exposing their deeds, good or bad, to God all the time (cf. Jn. 3:19-21)–have ongoing fellowship with one another and ongoing purification from sin.

The cool part I mentioned about the ransom is the parable of the strong man, whose house can only be plundered by one even stronger. Jesus gave himself as ransom in our place, but Jesus was stronger than Satan, bound him and plundered his house, then “triumphed over him in it” (Col. 2:15). The picture there is that he made a triumphal march, like a Roman general would, with his defeated enemies walking in chains behind him. Because he plundered Hades, its gates can no longer withstand the church.

If you liked this post, feel free to friend me on Facebook. If your cover photo is a beautiful girl, send a message as well as a friend request because I generally just delete those.

Posted in Early Christianity, Gospel, Modern Doctrines, Rebuilding the Foundations, Teachings that must not be lost | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Does Even the Slightest Sin Deserve Eternal Damnation?

Calvinists like to quote James 2:10 to teach that even the slightest sin requires eternal damnation. Here’s my response from my book, Rebuilding the Foundations:

The passage is in James 2 and talks about showing favoritism to one another, yet Calvinists have made it the gold standard for God’s final judgment. It reads:

But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. For he who said, “You shall not commit adultery,” also said, “You shall not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a lawbreaker. (James 2:8-11)

This passage warns us not to favor one person over another because we are all lawbreakers, having violated God’s law in one way or another. It does not say that God will judge us for breaking one small point of the law; it says we should not judge one another because we are all lawbreakers.
James 2:8-11 teaches that any violation of the law makes you a lawbreaker. It does not say all lawbreakers deserve eternal damnation. In fact, it says nothing at all about eternal damnation, nor who deserves it.

There are passages that talk about what violators of the law deserve. A very good one is the story of the adulterous woman (John 8:3-11). Jesus was teaching a small crowd near the temple. The scribes and Pharisees broke into their gathering and threw a woman at his feet. They announced, “Teacher, we found this woman in adultery, in the very act.”

I am sure the sarcasm dripped from their tongues as they unknowingly confronted their Creator and future Judge. “Now in our law, Moses commanded us to stone such women. What then do you say about her?”

Oddly, Jesus stooped down and wrote on the ground with his finger. I have heard several guesses as to what he was writing, my favorite being the name of the Pharisees’ mistresses. My guess is that the hypocritical condemnation of this woman, the ignoring of the man that was with her, and the sneering tone of the arrogant Pharisees infuriated the Son of God, who was a man tempted in every way we are (Heb. 4:15). Writing on the ground, whatever he wrote, may have given him time to refrain from ‘un-creating’ them with a thought, dissolving their miserable hides into sub-atomic particles.

Whatever the reason, he wrote long enough to simply state, in so many words, “All of you who have not broken the law, you have the right to throw a stone at her.”

James 2:10 is right. We are all lawbreakers. Even the Pharisees, when Jesus called them on it, could not deny it.

We also find out, through Jesus, just what God thinks we lawbreakers deserve: a second chance. Or maybe it was a third chance … or a fourth … or a forty-fourth … or maybe the four-hundred-and-ninetieth (70 times 7; Matt. 18:22).

Jesus told her, “Woman, where are your accusers? Did no one condemn you? … Neither do I condemn you. Go your way. From now on, sin no more.” (Jn. 8:10-11).

Here we have an actual case of how Jesus, and thus God, looks at adultery. Like all other sins, he forgives, and he asks the sinner to stop sinning. The people who aroused God’s wrath were the proud and hypocritical (Matt. 23).

Jesus gave us multiple examples of the way he, and thus his Father, judges. In his judgment, sinners need his physician-like skills to repent and become righteous (Luke 5:31-32).

****************

I am working on the cover of a new book called I Desire Mercy and Not Sacrifice. Whether or not Calvinists read my book, they should listen to that quote from both Hosea and Jesus, and  then they might not be so quick to condemn the innocent, nor the guilty.

I think the Kindle version of I Desire Mercy and Not Sacrifice is live.

Posted in Bible, Evangelicals, Gospel, Modern Doctrines, Protestants | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Tobit, Jesus, and the Breathtaking Power of Almsgiving from Within

Jesus told the Pharisees, “But give that which is within as charity and, behold, all things are clean for you” (Luke 11:41, NASB with note).

Tobit says something similar: “For almsgiving saves from death and purges away every sin. Those who give alms will enjoy a full life, but those who commit sin and do wrong are their own worst enemies” (12:9-10). (I know we Protestants don’t read the Deuterocanonicals–the Apocrypha, the 7 books in the Catholic Bibles that are not in Protestant Bibles, but Tobit’s statement about almsgiving was well-known to the church fathers and the Protestant Reformers.)

Peter converted “almsgiving” to “love” and wrote, “Above all, keep fervent in your love for one another, because love covers a multitude of sins” (1 Pet. 4:8).

We might all want to consider how generous we are, not only with our money, but with “that which is within,” especially to the poor.

Jesus said, “When you give a [a]reception, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, since they are unable to repay you; for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous” (Luke 14:13-14).

Just WOW! Let me take this opportunity to recommend Matt Newman’s Good in the Hood, which talks about how to “give what is within” to the poor by drawing close to them like the Samaritan did to the bleeding man on the road to Jericho.

Posted in Gospel, Holiness, Miscellaneous | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Today’s Hodge-Podge: Messengers, Large Church Meetings, Archippus, and Apostolic Succession

For those interested, I wrote this in an email in response to questions concerning Colossians 4:14, 16-17:

  1. For at least 150 years, perhaps longer, it was perfectly okay that the Sunday morning meetings grew large enough to need big meeting places, at least in the large cities, because the churches were still family. They took care of one another, shared possessions, visited one another house to house, etc. Having a big Sunday morning meeting in that culture is great. The day to day is fellowship is even more important than listening to pastors teach (Heb. 3:13; 10:24-25), so having big meetings on Sunday without the day to day fellowship is terrible, terrible, terrible. I don’t think that happened until pagans started rushing into the church, most unconverted spiritually, under Constantine. Unfortunately, that sort of public church never went away. It has lasted 1700 years.
  2. The answer to the question about passing on letters would be obvious if we translated the Greek word angellos. It means “messenger.” The “messengers” of the seven churches in Revelation 1-3 were the men responsible for sending and receiving letters on behalf of the church. It seems that every church had one. The 2nd century book, the Shepherd of Hermas, says that Clement was the messenger for Rome and was responsible for receiving the book and then deciding whether to pass it on to other churches.
  3. As for Archippus, we don’t know what his ministry was. We can’t be sure he was an elder, nor even that he was a shepherd in any way. Paul listed a lot of ministries in 1 Corinthians 12.

Apostolic succession: When Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Hippolytus talked about apostolic succession, they were refuting the gnostics. Apostolic succession is the passing down of the faith–also called the truth and the gospel–from generation to generation. To take that responsibility and turn it into a passing down of jurisdiction is to misuse what they taught. Yes, of course the passing down of the faith was from the elders to the next generation of elders and from a bishop to the bishop who succeeded him, but authority for a Christian is not the same as authority for the world. Christians in authority, our bishops and elders and whoever else, are to maintain the truth and serve the saints, training them to do the work of ministry (service). It is a sin to follow a sinner, so even if a man has apostolic succession, he has no authority except it come from his submission to God.

Posted in Bible, Church, Early Christianity, Gospel, History, History (Stories), Leadership | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reconciling the Evangelical Paul with the Biblical Paul

This is a re-issue of a 2023 post made on ancient-faith.com. A series of circumstances made me think I’d lose that URL, and I might. I do want to keep this blog alive, though, especially for saving things I’ve written on Facebook or by email.

It is common to think that we have to reconcile Paul with James. I suggest rather that we must reconcile the evangelical Paul, who believes that going to heaven has nothing to do with works, and the New Testament Paul, who wrote:

  • Eternal life is a reward for a pattern of good works (Rom. 2:6-7)
  • We have been reconciled to God, but we shall be saved from wrath through Christ and by his life (Rom. 5:9-10)
  • Eternal life is the result of holiness, which is the fruit of serving God (Rom. 6:22)
  • And, as one more thing to reconcile, in the very next verse, he said eternal life was a gift! (Rom. 6:23)
  • We “must” die if we live after the flesh, but we will live if we put to death the deeds of the body (Rom. 8:12-13)
  • Don’t be deceived! The unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God. Examples of the unrighteous are the sexually immoral, homosexuals, thieves, greedy, drunks, and slanderers (1 Cor. 6:9-11)
  • That he himself disciplines his body so that he is not disqualified (1 Cor. 9:24-27). “Disqualified” (Gr. adokimos) is a word Paul contrasts with having Jesus Christ in you in 2 Corinthians 13:5
  • Immediately after saying he had to discipline himself so that he does not fail the test (an alternate translation of adokimos), he argues for 11 verses that the various failures of the Israelites in the wilderness were examples for Christians, then writes, “Let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall” (1 Cor. 10:12)
  • We will all stand before the judgment seat of Christ to receive the deeds done in the body, whether good or bad. Fear of this judgment causes Paul to persuade men (2 Cor. 5:10-11)
  • It’s possible to receive the grace of God in vain (2 Cor. 6:1)
  • We must come out from among them, be separate, and not touch the unclean think if we want the Lord to receive us (2 Cor. 6:17-18)
  • The Christians of Corinth must examine themselves to see whether they are really in the faith, Jesus is really in them, or if they are “disqualified” (2 Cor. 13:5)
  • Those who “practice” (Gr. prasso) the works of the flesh will not inherit the kingdom of God (Gal. 5:19-21)
  • Don’t be deceived! Sowing to the flesh will result in corruption, sowing to the Spirit will result in everlasting life, so we should not grow weary in doing good (Gal. 6:7-8)
  • The sexually immoral, unclean, and greedy don’t have any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Don’t let anyone deceive you about this! It’s because of these things that the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience, so don’t partake in their deeds (Eph. 5:3-7)
  • Paul himself was leaving everything behind, counting everything loss, and pressing forward so that he know Jesus, the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his suffering, so that by any means he might attain to the resurrection of the dead. Paul did not regard himself as having already taken hold (Php. 3:7-14)
  • God will present us holy, without defect, and blameless before him if we continue in the faith grounded and settled (Col. 1:22-23)
  • Paul sent Timothy to the Thessalonians so he could know their faith because he feared the tempter had tempted the Thessalonians and Paul, Timothy, and Silas’ work would have been in vain (1 Thes. 3:5)
  • Timothy should hold faith and a good conscience. Some, having rejected those, have had a shipwreck in regard to their faith (1 Tim. 1:18-20)
  • Timothy should pay attention to himself and his teaching. By continuing in these things [the things in 1 Timothy] he will save both himself and his hearers (1 Tim. 4:16)
  • Wealthy people should do good, be rich in good works, and willing to share. This will allow them to lay up a good foundation for the time to come so they can lay hold of eternal life (1 Tim. 6:16-18)
  • Grace instructs us to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts and to live soberly, righteously, and godly in this present age, looking for the blessed hope of our Lord Jesus Christ, who died to redeem us from all lawlessness and purify a people zealous for good works (Tit. 2:11-14)
  • Titus is to affirm confidently than God’s people are to maintain good works (Tit. 3:8)
  • Finally, if Paul wrote Hebrews, as many believe, then there are many more verses associating works with “going to heaven,” such as Hebrews 3:14, which says that we are partakers of Christ only if we hold the beginning of our confidence firm to the end; Hebrews 6:6, which mentions falling away; and Hebrews 10:37-39, which tells us that those who shrink back will be destroyed. That is not even mentioning Hebrews 12:14, a cognate to Romans 6:22, which says that no one will see the Lord without holiness.

I should also point out that “go to heaven” is not biblical terminology. You will not find those words in the New Testament. Instead, Jesus and his apostles talk about inheriting or entering the kingdom and, as Jesus said, this will not happen unless we do the will of our Father in heaven (Matt. 7:21).

Despite the staggering list of verses above, which suggest or directly state, that eternal life is a reward for good works, the evangelical Paul was not made up out of whole cloth. Paul did say:

  • that we are saved by grace, though faith, not of ourselves but the gift of God, not of works so that we can not boast (Eph. 2:8-9).
  • that we are justified by faith and not by the works of the law (Rom. 3:28)
  • that we are not saved by works of righteousness which we have done, but by God’s mercy (Tit. 3:5)

How do we reconcile the Paul who wrote Ephesians 2:8-9 with the Paul who wrote Ephesians 5:3-7?

That question can be answered in one sentence: “Saved” does not necessarily mean “go to heaven.” Only “inherit the kingdom” always means “go to heaven.”

“Saved,” the Greek word sozo, is a big word with a lot of meanings, just as it is in English. Thayer’s lexicon lists danger, destruction, and disease as things we can be saved from as well as from “the penalties of Messianic judgment” (cf. Ps. 2:12). More to our point, Romans 5:9-10 gives a couple things we can be saved from:

Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we will be saved from God’s wrath through him. For if while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we will be saved by his life.

When we are “now justified by his blood,” we are saved in a way that is best described by Ephesians 2:1-10. In verses 1-3, we are …

… dead in transgressions and sins, in which you once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the children of disobedience. We also all once lived among them in the lusts of our flesh, doing the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest.

Paul pulls out all the stops in these 3 verses. He is telling us just how bad our condition was before God “made us alive together with Christ” (v. 5). In verse 10, however, everything is changed:

We are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared before that we would walk in them.

That is a huge change, from being dead in our sins to being God’s workmanship, created in King Jesus for good works. In verse 8, Paul rightly calls this being saved.

Hebrews warns us, though, that there is one more thing coming:

It is appointed for me to die once, then the judgment.

That judgment still awaits us, and it is still according to works. That is why Paul says, “We shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ, to receive the deeds done in the body, whether good or bad” (2 Cor. 5:10). It is also why Paul does not stop at “now justified by his blood” in Romans 5:9. He adds;

… we will be saved from God’s wrath through him.

Romans 5:10 is similar.

We were reconciled by Jesus’ death, but we will be saved by his life.

From Romans 5:10, I cannot help leaping to Galatians 2:20:

I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. That life which I now live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself up for me.

If I let Jesus live through me, then I will be saved from God’s wrath through him and through his life. We are warned that God’s wrath is still in the future, and we are even told not to be deceived about it in Ephesians 5:6-7:

Let no one deceive you with empty words. For because of these things, the wrath of God comes on the children of disobedience. Therefore don’t be partakers with them.

You might be able to play with those words, but I cannot. I have been saved, made alive from my death in my sins and re-created in Christ Jesus to do good works, and I received that salvation by faith apart from works. Being enabled now by my new creation to do good works (Eph. 2:10), and knowing that the purpose of Jesus’ death was to ransom me from all lawlessness and to produce a people zealous for good works (Tit. 2:13-14), I am not at all surprised that God asks me to walk in that salvation, continuing in the faith, not moved away from it, but grounded and settled in it (Col. 1:22-23). I will sow to the Spirit and so reap eternal life (Gal. 6:8).

There is a sense in which the biblical Paul, the New Testament Paul, has two messages. We can be saved from the horrid state of slavery to sin by faith (Ephesians 2:1-10), and if we walk by the Spirit, we will do good and be rewarded with eternal life as a person who has patiently continued to do good in this present age (Romans 2:6-7; 8:1-13; Galatians 5:16-6:9).

Posted in Bible, Evangelicals, Modern Doctrines | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

The Demise of Ancient-Faith.com

I think God wants ancient-faith.com to end. You can read all the posts from before December, 2021 here. I refuse to keep writing blogs on a block builder as awful as this one, so there will be no more posts at paulfpavao.wordpress.com.

Ancient-faith.com is now attached, against my wishes, to a different wordpress.com site. For some unknown reason, it has access to a better platform to write on, but I have had so many problems with that domain name over the last two weeks that they seem miraculous. In other words, the problems were so bad, so persistent, and so impossible to work around that I am pretty certain I am fighting God.

I am able to use the wayback machine to find old posts people ask about. I save them as text files, and I will eventually upload them to christian-history.org, which will become my only website.

Pray that I do God’s will in all this, please. I have had email conversations with people all over the world because of this blog and Christian-history.org (and my books). I do not want to cut those off.

I see this is being sent to almost 200 subscribers. Wow! Some may not even remember me because it’s been so long since I posted. If you want to keep up with me, my email address is paul@christian-history.org, and you can also friend or follow me on Facebook. My name is unique. You’ll find me.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Ancient-faith.com Is Moved and New Subscription Works

I have the new subscription at Ancient-Faith.com at the new webhost up and running. As mentioned in the last post I sent out, if you want to stay subscribed to my posts, you’ll have to subscribe again at the new webhost, sorry. Just go to https://www.ancient-faith.com, and you will see the new blog and the new subscription block on the top right.

As for this subscription, you will never get an email from it again unless something weird happens. I will be completely removing the old traces of the blog on the old webhost over the next month. You can just unsubscribe at the bottom of this email as well.

Sorry for the trouble, but I am really, really glad to be leaving the old servers and the increasing number of controls they have been putting on the blog. I am so happy to be going to new servers and just writing, not figuring out how to navigate bizarre writing software.

Thank you so much for having subscribed, and I hope you will want to head to Ancient-faith.com and subscribe again. Oh, and don’t forget the dash or you will be subscribing to an Eastern Orthodox blog.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments