The Trinity and Nicea

Someone wrote me claiming that Theodosius I forced the whole Roman empire to believe in the Trinity doctrine in 381. He suggested a book, but the synopsis on Amazon was so bad there is no way I am going to read it. Here is my response to that synopsis.

One side note: Theodosius did make such a decree, but it was in 383. The Council of Constantinople is given credit for confirming the Nicene Creed and putting the Arian Controversy to rest. That happened in 381, but it’s not true that the Council of Constantinople ended the controversy. The book is correct that Theodosius ended the controversy. It is wrong in suggesting he created a new doctrine in doing so.

The following is thoroughly explained, using ancient histories, in my book, Decoding Nicea, which we should have available on Amazon in the next couple weeks. Until then, you can get a good taste of it (four chapters and appendices) at at online for free. You can also buy the book already under the name In the Beginning Was the Logos on Kindle for just $4.99 (even though it’s a 460-page book). Don’t buy the print edition because the updated print edition will be out for $12.95 very soon.

Anyway, here’s my response. I’m pretty sure you’ll enjoy it.

The Development of the Trinity: The True Story

The synopsis takes a fact and spins it into a falsehood, which would be normal if the writer is a politician. If he is pretending to be a historian, however, he ought not to twist truths into non-truths.

Truth is that there was no argument at all over the subject of the Father and Son in the early days of the church. They had a definite belief that was universally accepted. Arius challenged that believe in 318. He was simply excommunicated, as one lone elder has no ability to overthrow the long established teaching of the Church. He managed to get a politically inclined bishop to back him, however, so it became a controversy among churches in the East (and in the eastern Roman empire only).

The Council of Nicea should have simply ended that controversy, but it didn’t. The church had let the emperors meddle in church affairs, and Eusebius of Nicomedia (not to be confused with his contemporary, Eusebius the historian) swung the opinions of the royal court and soon of the emperor toward the Arian heresy.

Constantius, Constantine’s son, took the side of the Arians in 337, and the battle was on, though it only once affected the western empire.

Finally, an elder of the Novatians* made a brilliant suggestion. What the church had not lost was a respect for their ancestors. The elder suggested to the bishop in Constantinople that he tell Emperor Theodosius to ask Arian and semi-Arian sects whether they agreed that the church should hold to the opinions of the fathers of the church before them. None could say no because the people would have rejected them.

*Novatians: followers of Novatian, who split the church in Rome in the 250’s over the repentance of Christians who lapsed during persecutions. There was little difference between the Novatians and the united apostolic churches, so they eventually just came back together again.

The emperor then asked them to prove their case from the writings of the fathers, the leaders of the apostolic churches. Of course, they could not, so he banished them from the major cities. He did not disband them. He did not make it illegal to hold to Arian or semi-Arian views.

In the end, the accurate Nicene definition triumphed, but not for long. It was mixed with modalist* ideas, which had existed in the background or under the surface since near the time of the apostles, and it turned into our modern co-equal Trinity, something a bit different than the Nicene definition and the beliefs of the earlier leaders of the church.

*Modalist: There is one God who is one person who operates in three “modes.” He’s the Father in creation, the Son in redemption, and the Holy Spirit in the church, but all one person, not three.

The early fathers held that the Father was the one God, who had a Son, Jesus Christ, who was literally the Word/Wisdom/Reason of God, born before time began from the bosom of the Father. The one God was the Father, who had a Son, the one Lord, Jesus Christ (1 Cor. 8:6). There was one divinity, the source of which was in the Father but included the Son because the Son is the Father’s Word/Wisdom/Reason. The Son proceeded from the Father, just as the Spirit proceeds from the Father.

This was the view of the early churches, explained rather thoroughly from Justin Martyr in AD 150 on and by many early fathers. It is this view that was confirmed at Nicea. It is this view that leaves no difficult verses to explain in Scripture, and which can implicitly be found in the writers before Justin.

About Paul Pavao

I am married, the father of six, and currently the grandfather of two. I run a business, live in a Christian community, teach, and I am learning to disciple others better than I have ever been able to before. I believe God has gifted me to restore proper foundations to the Christian faith. In order to ensure that I do not become a heretic, I read the early church fathers from the second and third centuries. They were around when all the churches founded by the apostles were in unity. I also try to stay honest and open. I argue and discuss these foundational doctrines with others to make sure my teaching really lines up with Scripture. I am encouraged by the fact that the several missionaries and pastors that I know well and admire as holy men love the things I teach. I hope you will be encouraged too. I am indeed tearing up old foundations created by tradition in order to re-establish the foundations found in Scripture and lived on by the churches during their 300 years of unity.
This entry was posted in History, Modern Doctrines and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Trinity and Nicea

  1. paulfpavao says:

    Please, suggest away. Thank you! If I may plug the book one more time because people like us have a long reading list, I had my daughter-in-law/graphic artist/co-editor working on an index for the book, and she told me, “I keep getting distracted reading the book. I don’t know if anyone has told you, but this is really interesting.” She had already edited it a couple times, so I was pretty thrilled about the kudo. One of my friends dad’s, who is over 70 because my friends are usually around 50 like me, told my mom he would never have dreamed of looking at the church history section of a bookstore until he read my book, then found himself browsing the section the next time he was in one. Just trying to drive Decoding Nicea up your reading list a little :-D.

    For anyone else, I’m trying to get the paperback up on Amazon again after taking it down to try to add an index. It’s going to be a long project, so we’ll try updating it in the summer. The Kindle version doesn’t need an index because of the search function.

  2. Jim says:


    I just found out about your book on Facebook! I will be downloading a copy today and look forward to reading it. Might I suggest you put a widget on your sidebar so people can discover it? I don’t know how long it has been out, but as a follower of your blog I didn’t hear about it here!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.