Liberal Arts and the Word of God: Emotion and Why God Still Speaks Today

There’s probably some really great title for this blog, better than "Liberal Arts and the Word of God," but I just can’t seem to find it. I thought of titles involving the right brain as well, but I thought that would mystify too many people.

So, let’s get to the point:

God doesn’t just want to speak to your left brain (the logical, exact, scientific, and mathematical side of your brain), but if you want to actually follow through on the commands of God—to avoid being a hypocrite—then you need God to speak to your left brain as well.

A friend (Adam Walker) linked to a great article on Apple and its competition with the PC, and it had the most amazing quote by Steve Jobs (Apple’s CEO):

I’ve said this before, but thought it was worth repeating: It’s in Apple’s DNA that technology alone is not enough. That it’s technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing.

This was said concerning the iPad 2.

Last fall I sat and talked with two friends, both of whom work for Apple. They were commenting on how Apple was selling a produce, the iPad, that served no new purpose. Everything the iPad does can be done with an iPhone or a laptop.

Steve Job, by mentioning liberal arts and the humanities, says that the iPad’s appeal is not usefulness; it is beauty.

The iPad appeals to the heart.

Every good salesman knows that almost every purchase is an emotional decision, not a logical one. (I base that on numerous sales training courses I’ve been through.)

God is not a salesman, but God made us. He not only knows how we’re constituted, but he approves of it. He’s the source of it.

Thus, the Word of God, reduced to it’s left-brained, merely logical, scientific and mathematical basis, is, um, let’s say dehydrated. It’s like Carnation Evaporated Milk or a military MRE (Meals Ready to Eat, which are mostly "just add water" powders and dried patties). It may have all the vitamins and nutrients you need, but very few people like to eat it.

Does this produce a different emotion than an MRE?
Produce from Rose Creek Village Farms
MRE; photo by Christopherlin, used with permission
MRE contents

The point of all this?

In the early days of the church, the writings of the old covenant were a rich source of spiritual insight. Christian teachers, across the board, taught that all new covenant disciples, being endowed by God with the Holy Spirit, could look into the words of the Law and the Prophets and glean spiritual truths.

An example used repeatedly in their writings: The food laws, which taught that the only clean animals were those that chewed the cud and parted the hoof, were not about food. God doesn’t care about food, and food can’t defile a man. Instead, those laws taught us that we are to be in fellowship with those that ruminate on the Word of God and separate from the world.

An example from Bible class with my kids a couple days ago: In Genesis chapter one, there is a reason that light and day are created both first and three days before the sun. Light is of first and foremost importance. We are children of the light and of the day, and our lives are to be a testimony of the Word of God. Further, God didn’t want us to think that light for us is physical. The physical light and the physical day would come later and be of secondary important. Our light comes not from the sun but from the living Word of God. In the deepest darkness, the voice of God cries, "Let there be light," and there is light.

Another common early Christian example: When the Israelites defeated the Amalekites on the way to The Promised Land, they were able to be victorious only while Moses’ hands were in the air. Why? It is because we are to learn that our victory over our enemies comes only through the cross. To the early Christians the raising of hands always represented the cross. It represented both our triumph through the cross and our access to God through the cross.

Why such pictures? Why do we have to focus on analogies, and why did God want us to have to dig, search, and be spiritual enough to find those analogies in the words of the old covenant?

The reason is that God knows that obeying his commands is more than a dry, logical choice. We are not dry, logical creatures. We have a left brain, and a right brain, and that is not some physical limitation, but the purposeful choice of God our Creator.

There is a liberal arts side to the Word of God, and that is the purposeful choice of our Father, who had made us like himself. Our life in him is imbued not just with commands and obedience, but with beauty, emotion, zeal, and excitement. We are supposed to be delighted with discovery and deeply satisfied with spiritual insights.

Alone, left to our decisions and commitment, we will falter and stumble. God has put us in the body of Christ, where we all need one another, and where our sharing is not just the nutrition of obedience to God, but the beautiful colors and rich packaging that is allegory, spiritual insight, and participation in the revelation of God.

Excursus: Can God be Silent?

This is one reason it’s so horrifying for me to hear that the revelation of God ended when the last book of the New Testament was written. (Of course, for centuries the churches would never have agreed on what the last book of the New Testament or exactly how many books of the New Testament there were.)

Did God take a vow of silence for the last 2,000 years? As the church has wandered here and there, and as both counterfeit and utterly corrupt Christian movements have arisen, God has had nothing to say in the way of correction? He has waited around for men to know about, find, and interpret a book that’s really a collection of books?

Is that what you would have done if you were God? You’d have sat silently through the last wild 2,000 years of history?

God is not like that. We wrongly attribute 400 years of silence to him in the "intertestimental period." There was no 400 years of silence. God prophesied what would be happening during those 400 years through Daniel, and the incredible and powerful history of Isreal continued as described in the books of the Maccabees. Finally, even when Jesus showed up as a baby, we read of the prophetess Anna in the Gospel of Luke. There were still prophets and prophetesses in Israel until John the Baptist, when the gift of prophecy moved to the church.

God is never silent. It’s horrifying to hear people say that he’s had nothing to say since the time of the apostles.

About Paul Pavao

I am married, the father of six, and currently the grandfather of two. I run a business, live in a Christian community, teach, and I am learning to disciple others better than I have ever been able to before. I believe God has gifted me to restore proper foundations to the Christian faith. In order to ensure that I do not become a heretic, I read the early church fathers from the second and third centuries. They were around when all the churches founded by the apostles were in unity. I also try to stay honest and open. I argue and discuss these foundational doctrines with others to make sure my teaching really lines up with Scripture. I am encouraged by the fact that the several missionaries and pastors that I know well and admire as holy men love the things I teach. I hope you will be encouraged too. I am indeed tearing up old foundations created by tradition in order to re-establish the foundations found in Scripture and lived on by the churches during their 300 years of unity.
This entry was posted in Bible, Modern Doctrines and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.