Was Jesus a Historical Figure?

I was reading yesterday’s post at The Failed Atheist. I listened to the video on it, and I simply must repost it here.

This is a liberal, non-Christian, pro-gnostic scholar—Bart Ehrman—who really irritates me. In this case, however, I think “The Infidel Guy” was shocked to find out that his anti-fundamentalist-Christian guest thinks that only the ignorant deny the historicity of Jesus.

I’ve got more comments below, but here’s the video (which is really only audio):

The main point of the video is obvious. Bart Ehrman gives some examples of why we can be confident that Jesus was a historical figure. The Infidel Guy’s only response is basically, “Can’t we just doubt everything we don’t like?”

Embarrassing.

There’s a couple more things I should mention that are mentioned in the interview.

“Jesus Christ” doesn’t mean something put together like that, if by “mean” we are implying that there’s some Hebrew definition for Jesus Christ. Jesus is a name. Yes, it has a meaning, but it’s a name. Christ is a title. It’s the Greek word for “anointed one,” but in the context of the New Testament, it basically means king. It means God’s chosen king for his chosen people, but it mostly means king.

In this interview, Bart Ehrman is being a good historian in the matter of whether Jesus existed. The fact is that Paul’s letters, the existence of Christians in Rome under Nero in the AD 60’s, the utter consistency of early Christian letters and drawings, and numerous other things that constitute the “whole tenor” of history make it clear that one ought to trust who the Christians said Jesus was, at least in the matter of being a crucified Jewish prophet.

But on other things, he shows the stubbornness of so many people. He tells Infidel Guy that no serious historian questions the existence of a person Jesus. The Infidel Guy gives him Robert M. Price. It takes Ehrman a significant amount of time to admit he knows of him, and in fact has had correspondence with him. The Infidel Guy points out that Robert Price is a serious historian, Ehrman questions him. The Infidel Guy says he’s a professor; Ehrman insists he doesn’t teach anywhere.

Price is the professor of theological and scriptural studies at Colemon Theological Seminary. It appears to me that institution is probably not accredited, but he is teaching. Price used to be at another similar institution which offered undergraduate courses that were accredited, so he has taught.

The fact is, Ehrman went too far when he said no serious scholar questions the historicity of the person Jesus. People are people, and even “experts” are moved by their biases. You can find legitimately qualified experts denying the obvious in any field of inquiry.

For me, though, it’s like what Jesus said about faithfulness. He who is honest in little things will be honest in big things. If you can’t be honest with the little things, you’re going to miss the evidences that will prevent you from building a house of cards in whatever areas you are studying.

About Paul Pavao

I am married, the father of six, and currently the grandfather of two. I run a business, live in a Christian community, teach, and I am learning to disciple others better than I have ever been able to before. I believe God has gifted me to restore proper foundations to the Christian faith. In order to ensure that I do not become a heretic, I read the early church fathers from the second and third centuries. They were around when all the churches founded by the apostles were in unity. I also try to stay honest and open. I argue and discuss these foundational doctrines with others to make sure my teaching really lines up with Scripture. I am encouraged by the fact that the several missionaries and pastors that I know well and admire as holy men love the things I teach. I hope you will be encouraged too. I am indeed tearing up old foundations created by tradition in order to re-establish the foundations found in Scripture and lived on by the churches during their 300 years of unity.
This entry was posted in History. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Was Jesus a Historical Figure?

  1. Monster says:

    I like how he goes from never having heard of him to knowing for a fact he doesn’t teach anywhere. Both of those guys ended up looking like fools by the end of that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.